[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Plans to build wind turbine on outskirts of Haverhill  

Credit:  By Jack Tappin | Published on 18/04/2013 | Haverhill Echo | www.haverhillecho.co.uk ~~

A 78 metre high wind turbine could be built on the outskirts of Haverhill by the same man who will erect a controversial turbine in Clare.

After getting the go ahead to put up the Clare turbine on Maple Hill of Chilton Street, despite the opposition of five parish councils, numerous heritage groups and the local St Edmundsbury councillors, James Sills now plans to build a second solo turbine on the land between Hazel Stub and Nosterfield End.

Numerous groups oppose the turbine, including Haverhill Town Council and Shudy Camps Parish Council and many of the surrounding residents, though notably the parish councils of Sturmer and Castle Camps do not object.

The plans are due to be decided by St Edmundsbury Borough Council on April 30, though as there have been objections they will then be called in by the ward member for Haverhill South, which is represented by Cllrs Maureen Byrne and Phil French, and be heard by the development control committee.

Cllr Byrne, who opposed the plans for the Clare turbine, said she will represent the views of nearby residents in the matter.

“With the information I’ve got at the moment I don’t think it’s a suitable location for a turbine,” she said.

“I’m not anti-turbines and I think in some instances in the right location you can have them without them being troublesome and making people object to them, but there are alternatives to putting them so near residential communities.”

Haverhill Town Council objects to the proposals on a number of grounds, one of which was that the public consultation period was insufficient.

The council also states that ‘the visual impact of the wind turbine will have a detrimental impact on the surrounding area’, and that the neighbouring Grade II listed buildings will suffer by its presence.

Shudy Camps council recommended rejection, saying: “There are potentially unresolved issues with possible effects on digital TV reception and air traffic control radars, which clearly need to be resolved.”

For all the latest news see Thursday’s (April 25) Echo.

Source:  By Jack Tappin | Published on 18/04/2013 | Haverhill Echo | www.haverhillecho.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.