[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

PTC update: IRS clarifies ‘commence construction’ requirements  

Credit:  by Mark Del Franco on Tuesday 16 April 2013 | North American Windpower | nawindpower.com ~~

In order to qualify for the production tax credit (PTC), the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) says that renewable energy projects starting construction in 2013 must be able to demonstrate “significant work of a physical nature” and show that 5% of their costs have been incurred.

The IRS ruling comes nearly four months after Congress extended the PTC for one year. In the extension, Congress amended the language to allow any project that starts construction in 2013 to qualify for the PTC, rather than require the project to be fully completed. Congress tweaked the rule to allow developers to maximize the tax incentive.

According to the IRS, the guidance affects qualified facilities under Section 45 D of the Internal Revenue Code, including wind, geothermal, biomass, landfill gas, incremental hydroelectric and ocean energy projects that are under construction by December 2013.

While the IRS guidance largely mirrors the guidance the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued for the Section 1603 cash-grant program in 2010, there are a few subtle inclusions worth noting, according to Keith Martin, a partner at the law firm Chadbourne & Parke.

For example, the IRS has ruled that there is no deadline to complete projects that begin construction this year. However, the IRS maintains that wind developers “must show a continuous effort to advance toward completion of the facility,” a provision that Martin says could introduce “an element of uncertainty in project finance.”

“Upon first glance,” he explains, “[the requirement] could complicate things.”

David Burton, a partner at law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, agrees.
He says the inclusion of such a requirement could be a hindrance for tax-equity deals because tax-equity investors may be concerned about the “subjective nature” of the continuous-construction provision.

Under the IRS notice for PTCs, Burton explains, the tax-equity investor will need to consider not only whether 5% of a project’s costs have been incurred, but also whether continuous construction was undertaken starting Jan. 1, 2014. “Continuous construction introduces an additional subjective element that requires an incremental layer of analysis for tax-equity investors and their counsel to grapple with,” he says.

Primarily, Burton adds, the continuous-construct provision means that wind developers “cannot sit back and wait. [Developers] must be making continuous efforts [on wind projects] from Dec. 31, 2013, forward.”

Taken as a whole, Burton says the rules pertaining to the PTC are more transparent than the previously issued guidance for the Section 1603 cash-grant program.

For example, the IRS has spelled out several exceptions that could prevent developers from continuously constructing wind farms. According to the IRS, the exceptions include “severe weather conditions, natural disasters, licensing and permitting delays … labor stoppages, inability to obtain specialized equipment of limited availability, the presence of endangered species, financing delays of less than six months and supply shortages.”

Notably, the IRS says it will also allow wind developers to treat multiple turbines as a single wind farm so that developers do not have to prove that construction started at each individual turbine location, which Martin says is a departure from how the IRS typically viewed wind farms.

“Since 1994, the IRS has analyzed each turbine as if it were a separate power project,” Martin explains, adding that tweaking the definition is a good thing for the wind industry because “it will be easier for wind developers to show a project has started construction.”

With respect to requiring wind developers to prove “physical work of a significant nature,” Martin suspects the IRS was cognizant not to repeat a misstep from the cash-grant guidance.

“Work at the factory counts only if done after the project has placed a binding equipment order with the manufacturer or if the work is custom made,” he notes.

While the PTC guidance should help project development move forward, some wind developers maintain the good news is tempered when measured against macroeconomic factors.

“Clear construction guidance is important,” explains Art Sasse, a spokesperson for Portland, Ore.-based Iberdrola Renewables. “But other forces like demand for wind power, specific project economics, and regulatory certainty to enable our customers to enter into long-term power purchase agreements outweigh today’s news.”

Source:  by Mark Del Franco on Tuesday 16 April 2013 | North American Windpower | nawindpower.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter