Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Lawsuit over Litchfield wind turbine ban ends
Credit: By AMANDA FRIES | Observer-Dispatch | Posted Apr 15, 2013 | www.uticaod.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
An appeal on a court ruling of a lawsuit brought against the town of Litchfield over an industrial wind ban law has been withdrawn.
The lawsuit asserted that the Litchfield Town Board violated several laws during the process of creating the local wind law that was passed last year.
While town law bans industrial turbines, smaller, domestic powered turbines – 120 feet or less at 50 kilowatts – are permitted.
In December 2012, a Herkimer County Supreme Court judge dismissed the lawsuit, and the five Litchfield residents – who first issued the complaint – had appealed.
The town’s Attorney Douglas Zamelis said in a release that the residents failed to “perfect their appeal within the time allowed,” so the town issued a dismissal of the appeal.
The plaintiffs’ Attorney Meave Tooher, of Tooher & Barone, LLP, in Albany, said they withdrew the appeal because of financial considerations.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: