LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Grafton residents question Selectboard’s decision 

Credit:  By DOMENIC POLI / Reformer Staff | April 16, 2013 | Brattleboro Reformer | www.reformer.com ~~

GRAFTON – Two members of the public grilled the town’s Selectboard on Tuesday with questions about the planning commission and a meeting between the board’s chairman and a representative from an energy company constructing a test tower.

Iberdrola Renewables, operating as Atlantic Wind LLC, is one of the world’s largest energy companies and received permits to erect three test towers – two in Windham and one in Grafton on land owned by New Hampshire-based Meadowsend Timberlands Limited. The towers could be a precursor to Windham County’s first commercial wind turbines, depending on the weather data they produce.

The project has considerable opposition from the town and residents Liisa Kissel and Anna Vesely questioned why Selectboard Chairman Al Sands has had two meetings – including one involving lunch – with someone from Atlantic Wind and Meadowsend.

Vesely, who once served on the Selectboard for eight years, said all such meetings should be documented for public record.

“Otherwise you’re holding secret meetings out of the public view without any authorization to negotiate,” she told board members Bill Kearns, Gus Plummer and Noralee Hall. “And I don’t believe that’s proper.”

Kissel said she would like an update on the meetings but the Selectboard members at the front of the room said they had none for her. They said she would have to ask Sands, who was not present.

Kissel said all Selectboard members should be informed about the two meetings.

Earlier in Monday’s Selectboard meeting, Kissel asked why the board decided to keep a five-member planning commission when at least two new candidates had been recommended. She said the commission traditionally has had seven members.

Kearns corrected her and said any notion of such a tradition is untrue. He said there have been fewer than five members in years past. He also said the depth of the commission is up to the discretion of the Selectboard, which decided five was sufficient.

Kissel said the planning commission had accepted two candidates and wanted to have seven members within its ranks. Vesely chimed in with a comment of her own.

“When we the public here see that the Selectboard has decided not to accept two recommended candidates that the commission itself was content with, we’re saying, ‘Hey. What gives?'” she said Monday.

She said the Selectboard always accepted the recommendations of planning commission when she was on the board.

“It is absolutely within your authority. You bet,” she said. “But that doesn’t make it right, it doesn’t make it good and it doesn’t make it what’s best for the town.”

Kissel said the townspeople deserve to know the grounds for the Selectboard’s decision.

“The grounds are that five people are enough,” Kearns answered.

Source:  By DOMENIC POLI / Reformer Staff | April 16, 2013 | Brattleboro Reformer | www.reformer.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky