LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Howard Co. turbine setback is too close 

Credit:  Kokomo Tribune | April 11, 2013 | kokomotribune.com ~~

I was doing some research and found some disturbing information about wind turbine setback distances relating to safety.

Our Howard County wind ordinance states that 1,042 feet is sufficient from a dwelling to an operating wind turbine. The Plan Commission director has stated on many occasions he is satisfied with the distance.

I wonder if he’s willing to guarantee, for the record, the safety of the residents within the 1,042-foot footprint of the E.ON eastern Howard County wind farm. Also, are the county commissioners willing to guarantee, for the record, the safety of a 1,042-foot setback?

A wind energy company safety manual states, “Do not stay within a radius of 400 meters (1,300 feet) from the turbine.” Most European countries require setbacks from buildings of 3,255 to 6,510 feet. France has a “500 meter exclusion zone”; people are not allowed within 1,625 feet of a turbine.

In the case of a runaway turbine, a wind company, Vestas, advises to “evacuate by running upwind … access to the surrounding area in a radius of at least 500 meters (1,640 feet) must be restricted.” One older runaway turbine in California shut down traffic for a day. Apparently, the turbine brakes failed.

I have always believed that our elected county officials have the duty to protect our civil liberties and Fifth Amendment rights. Now, I’m wanting reassurance that we county residents will be protected.

Darrell Pennycoff

Sharpsville

Source:  Kokomo Tribune | April 11, 2013 | kokomotribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky