News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Company responds to Collector windfarm concerns  

Credit:  ABC News | 11 April 2013 | www.abc.net.au ~~

The company behind a proposed windfarm in the Upper Lachlan Shire Council says it will address traffic concerns with the project once it gets approval.

The Collector Wind Farm was going to see almost 70 turbines built south west of Goulburn.

Following 140 public submissions on the project, RATCH Australia says it is now looking to remove five turbines to help reduce habitat loss.

In its submission on the project the Roads and Maritime Services opposed widening stretches of the Hume Highway to transport oversized loads, saying it wasn’t necessary.

It also says it doesn’t support right hand movements across the highway, because of safety and efficiency concerns.

RATCH Australia says further assessments relating to road access would be carried out if the environmental assessment is approved.

It says a detailed traffic management plan would be included in the project construction plan.

The Office of Environment and Heritage raised concerns about the impact the windfarm will have box-gum woodland in the area.

It says the loss of habitat could impact several threatened species including the eastern bentwing bat.

In its response to the submissions, RATCH Australia says it will reduce the number of turbines to 63.

It says removing five turbines from the area will reduce permanent habitat loss by a quarter.

The Upper Lachlan Shire Council has called for all turbines in the Collector Wind Farm to be set back two kilometres from dwellings.

RATCH Australia says in its original proposal three homes were within a two kilometre radius of the turbines.

But under its revised project, there’s only one.

It says it doesn’t have to get permission from the home owner, because no work would be carried out on the property.

Source:  ABC News | 11 April 2013 | www.abc.net.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.