[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Judge sides with Xcel, throwing out wind farm dispute with EnXco  

Credit:  Article by: DAVID SHAFFER , Star Tribune | Updated: April 4, 2013 | StarTribune | www.startribune.com ~~

A federal judge has sided with Xcel Energy and vindicated the utility for its 2010 decision to cancel a $400 million wind farm in North Dakota that posed a potential risk to two protected birds.

U.S. District Judge Michael Davis dismissed a lawsuit filed by EnXco, the would-be developer of the Merricourt project, whose wind turbines were seen as a risk to the piping plover and whooping crane. EnXco, a U.S. affiliate of Paris-based EDF Energies Nouvelles, sued Xcel for dropping out of the 100-turbine wind farm, which was never built.

But Davis, ruling in Minneapolis, threw out the case before trial, saying that Xcel had a right to terminate its agreement at a drop-dead date – March 31, 2010 – because EnXco had not yet obtained site permit for the project. That permit later was approved.

EnXco contended that bird-protection issues could have been addressed at the project site near Ellendale, N.D. EnXco said the company already had purchased turbines for the Merricourt project, although Xcel asserted that EnXco deployed them at another wind farm, cutting its losses.

“EnXco is a sophisticated commercial entity that has entered into many projects involving wind projects and other renewable energy,” the judge wrote in an order signed Wednesday and filed electronically on Thursday. “Accordingly, the court can reasonably infer that EnXco is knowledgeable of the varying risks that may arise with respect to such projects.”

Source:  Article by: DAVID SHAFFER , Star Tribune | Updated: April 4, 2013 | StarTribune | www.startribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter