LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Board OKs drainage-tax ordinance 

In other business, the board decided to oppose state House Bill 484 and state Senate Bill 491, which establish a permitting system and related regulations, related to wind-energy facilities. If it becomes law, it would regulate wind-energy farms such as the one proposed by Invenergy for a site near Pantego. “These bills are putting some significant restrictions on wind-turbine projects. … We received communication from the Invenergy folks, and they feel this bills are excessive,” said County Manager Randell Woodruff. “My concern is we’ve gone through this clearinghouse process for a number of months now that is administered by the federal government, Department of Defense and the Pentagon, and we’re moving forward. I think at our last meeting in Raleigh, they indicated, hopefully, that within 45 or 60 days they’re going to be finished with their project, their process. Now that state is coming along and creating this additional, cumbersome process that’s going to undermine what the federal government is doing right now. It’s just not necessary.” Commissioner Al Klemm replied, “They’re want to make it so hard that nobody does it.”

Credit:  By Mike Voss | Washington Daily News | April 4, 2013 | www.wdnweb.com ~~

Drainage districts in Beaufort County will bear the burden of collection fees associated with efforts to collect delinquent drainage-district maintenance assessments, according to a new county ordinance.

The Beaufort County Board of Commissioners approved the ordinance at its meeting Monday. The issue surfaced at the board’s March 11 meeting, at which time the board asked County Attorney Billy Mayo to research the matter and prepare an ordinance for its consideration.

At the March meeting, Commissioner Hood Richardson contends that county tax dollars should not pay for efforts, including foreclosures, to collect delinquent maintenance assessments. Paying for such efforts is the responsibility of the drainage district, he said.

In other business, the board decided to oppose state House Bill 484 and state Senate Bill 491, which establish a permitting system and related regulations, related to wind-energy facilities. If it becomes law, it would regulate wind-energy farms such as the one proposed by Invenergy for a site near Pantego.

“These bills are putting some significant restrictions on wind-turbine projects. … We received communication from the Invenergy folks, and they feel this bills are excessive,” said County Manager Randell Woodruff. “My concern is we’ve gone through this clearinghouse process for a number of months now that is administered by the federal government, Department of Defense and the Pentagon, and we’re moving forward. I think at our last meeting in Raleigh, they indicated, hopefully, that within 45 or 60 days they’re going to be finished with their project, their process. Now that state is coming along and creating this additional, cumbersome process that’s going to undermine what the federal government is doing right now. It’s just not necessary.”
Commissioner Al Klemm replied, “They’re want to make it so hard that nobody does it.”

Commissioner Ed Booth said, “If this bill passes … and this project is defeated and goes down, I want to pursue every avenue that we can to get some conservationist money for our folks who are going to lose all this tax base.”

The board voted unanimously to adopt a resolution opposing the bills.

Source:  By Mike Voss | Washington Daily News | April 4, 2013 | www.wdnweb.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky