[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Objectors see 77m turbine plans rejected 

Credit:  Cornish Guardian | April 03, 2013 | www.thisiscornwall.co.uk ~~

Villagers who campaigned against plans for a wind turbine in their community are celebrating after planners rejected the proposal – against officers’ advice.

Members of Cornwall Council’s east sub-area planning committee voted 9-3 against the application by farmer Chris Parsons for a 500kW three-bladed turbine on a 50-metre mast at Beacon, South Petherwin.

The committee said the visual impact of the turbine, which would have measured 77 metres overall and was opposed by South Petherwin Parish Council and many residents, would be too great.

Mr Parsons, who spoke in defence of his plans at the meeting at Liskeard, later told the Cornish Guardian he would be listening to people before deciding whether to appeal against the decision.

He said the turbine would have provided power for 300 homes and brought £5,000 a year in community benefit to South Petherwin.

Fran Dennison, clerk to South Petherwin Parish Council, said they were opposed because one turbine had already been erected in the parish, at Trevozah Cross, and a turbine at Storm on the Pennygillam Estate in Launceston would be visible from the village.

Applications for four more turbines were currently going through the planning process, and this would constitute an unacceptable proliferation of turbines in and around one small village.

“Not only is this turbine at Beacon too close to the centre of the village and too intrusive to too many residents; the mere fact that it’s the Beacon indicates that it’s the highest point in the area and will be seen from miles around, including Launceston town and the castle,” she said.

Mrs Dennison said the proposed turbine was 600 metres from the whole village centre, not just one residence.

“It will dominate the village and, although the planning statement indicates otherwise, it will be seen clearly from the church,” she said.

“Trees aren’t a reliable shield for turbines; they can be cut down or die, even in churchyards.

“To sanction this turbine would be asking too many people to sacrifice too much for the profit of the landowner and an indeterminate and inefficient generation of electricity,” she said.

“The detrimental effect on the residents of South Petherwin and the surrounding area will not be offset by the relatively insignificant amount of electricity generated.”

She said the parish council also asked that any promise of community benefit be discussed only if a decision were made to approve turbine applications, adding: “In the eyes of the public, community benefit and bribery are very close cousins.”

Planning officer Mark Evans had said in his report to the committee that the proposed turbine would make a positive contribution toward the generation of renewable energy.

“There are not considered to be sustainable grounds for refusal based on ecology, neighbour impact, archaeology or highway safety,” he wrote.

“The landscape can accommodate this additional turbine without unacceptably eroding its quality or substantially harming the setting of the designated heritage assets within it.”

Source:  Cornish Guardian | April 03, 2013 | www.thisiscornwall.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky