[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind farm row as Girvan Community Council is accused of getting cosy with developers  

Credit:  By Harriet Brace | Published on Friday 29 March 2013 | Carrick Gazette | www.carricktoday.co.uk ~~

A cold wind blows at the backs of Girvan community councillors as involvement with windfarm developers provokes allegations of illegal activity.

At the March meeting of South Ayrshire Council’s regulatory panel Girvan Community Council was accused of “unacceptable” relations with PNE Wind, the applicants behind the eight-turbine Tralorg wind farm refused by the panel.

GCC chairman Ken Johnstone spoke on behalf of the community council, voicing their support for the Tralorg application.

“The applicant has communicated with from day one on community benefit and siting one of the turbines,” Mr Johnstone said, recounting the relocation of some turbines and reductions to blade tip heights as examples of their negotiations.

“PNE have promised community benefit which could provide much-needed regeneration funds,” he added.

But Maybole councillor Ann Galbraith told Mr Johnstone he should have done his homework before meeting with PNE representatives, and Troon councillor Nan McFarlane questioned the legality of GCC’s actions under the Scottish Government’s Planning Advice Note 47.

However, after careful examination of the advice it emerged that, while discussions on the planning merits of applications is “strongly discouraged” between planning applicants and community councils, it is not prohibited.

The document states that it is up to the planning authority to discuss issues with various parties if they think it necessary before coming to a decision.

Mr Johnstone said he was puzzled by the panel’s response. “I really didn’t expect the reaction I got,” he said. He even compared the procedure he was subjected to to the Spanish Inquisition – being only allowed to speak once and then required to remain silent while panel members discussed a potential breach of legislation.

“I felt that we had negotiated a good deal for our district,” Mr Johnstone said. “If I am accused of trying to get more work and funds for Girvan and District, then I plead guilty.”

Source:  By Harriet Brace | Published on Friday 29 March 2013 | Carrick Gazette | www.carricktoday.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch