[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Turbines will damage our tourism industry – Scottish Government report reveals  

Credit:  By Cameron Brooks | The Press and Journal | 28/03/2013 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

The Scottish Government approved plans for an offshore wind testing centre despite admitting it would have an impact on tourism and recreation in the north-east.

First Minister Alex Salmond insisted previously that Scotland’s tourism industry would grow alongside the development of offshore windfarms.

But a report – which helped form the basis of Energy and Tourism Minister Fergus Ewing’s approval of the European Offshore Wind Deployment Centre (EOWDC) – highlighted an “adverse visual impact” on Royal Aberdeen, Murcar Links and Trump International golf clubs.

Mr Ewing insisted last night that the 100MW project – a joint venture between Vattenfall, the Aberdeen Renewable Energy Group (Areg) and Technip Offshore Wind – was of national economic significance and the benefits outweighed the negative effects.

The government, which claims the offshore wind sector will support 28,000 jobs by 2020, said it was key to developing technologies to meet renewables targets.

However, Mr Ewing was unable to say how many jobs would be created during the construction phase of the testing centre and whether the turbines would be built in Scotland.

A report prepared by government agency Marine Scotland said the development would support only 25 jobs over the project’s 22-year lifetime – which the report described as “768 job years” worth of employment.

It also revealed that SNP ministers accepted wind power was “variable and cannot be relied on as a constant source of power”.

The report said, however, it was a necessary component of a balanced energy mix for Scotland.

And the Scottish Government said studies found the majority of tourists were generally positive towards windfarms.

US property developer Donald Trump, who has vowed to take legal action to stop the testing centre being built in sight of his £750million golf resort at the Menie Estate near Balme-die, hit out at the revelations.

“This could potentially create just 25 jobs – but that is not what they are presenting to people,” he said. “For them to talk about 800 job years may be the most disingenuous thing I have ever head.

“I don’t know how they can sit there with a straight face and talk about all the jobs this will create – it is disgraceful.”

The Trump Organisation’s international development director, George Sorial, said: “Fergus Ewing is the minister for both tourism and for energy – so which one is more important to him? I think this is obvious following this decision. It is a ridiculous setup.

“All this says is what we have been saying for more than a year now.

“You don’t need to commission a great big study to cometo the conclusion that tourism and an industrial zone do not mix.”

The report stated that the government accepted there was a risk of some adverse effects on tourism, both in relation to the other golf courses and more generally.

It added that ministers noted there were golf courses elsewhere in the UK that “co-exist” with offshore windfarms.

Mr Ewing said the turbines would have the capacity to produce enough electricity to power the equivalent of 49,000 homes in Aberdeen.

Michael Rieley, policy manager for industry group Scottish Renewables, said offshore windfarms were more productive than land-based ones.

“In the European market, offshore wind turbines are typically 4MW in size,” he said. “This is compared to onshore wind turbines, which are around 2MW.

“The test centre will be a European hub for research and development of the next generation of wind turbines that will be more efficient and cost-effective for consumers.”

Source:  By Cameron Brooks | The Press and Journal | 28/03/2013 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch