[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Pamlico commissioners to address budget, Tall Structures ordinance 

Credit:  By Charlie Hall, Sun Journal Staff | Published: Sunday, March 24, 2013 | www.newbernsj.com ~~

BAYBORO â€“ Pamlico County commissioners have two important meetings in the next seven days, beginning with a budget workshop Monday at the commissioners’ room on the second floor of the county courthouse. The public is welcome.

The board also will host a public hearing April 1 on the controversial Tall Structures ordinance, which would govern maximum 500-foot structures such as wind turbines and communications towers.

The ordinance is the work of the county planning board, which recently completed the nine-page document. It was ordered last year by the commissioners after a Florida wind energy company gave a presentation to the board, indicating a desire to build turbines in the county.

Among the considerations are the effects on the Cherry Point air station and its aviation training mission, which includes flight paths over most of Pamlico County.

The ordinance requires that any tall structure developer receive written permission from the military before approaching the county about a building permit.

The ordinance also addresses setbacks from property lines, which were greatly reduced from the original draft, which required a half-mile distance for public right of ways and property lines of land owners not participating in a tall structure project.

The setback was reduced to a maximum of 1,250 feet, based on a 500-foot structure. The rules also were clarified that there would be no setback property lines for adjacent land owners with tall structures built on their properties.

At the meeting to set the 7 p.m. public hearing date, the commissioners had some differences of opinion on the matter.

Chris Mele of Oriental, an opponent of the wind turbines, called the ordinance insufficient and too short. She noted that she had copies of tall structure ordinances that were much more precise. She also pointed out that military representatives had told the board during a previous presentation that federal law prohibits base commanders from opposing the construction of green energy structures such as windmills.

Commissioners Kenny Heath said he was not comfortable with the ordinance until some of the planning board or other county officials had visited a wind farm site.

Commissioner Paul Delamar III, who has been a proponent of wind farms as a needed industry in the county, said it was not feasible for anyone from the county to officially visit a windmill site. He added that if the board puts off a decision on the ordinance waiting for a site visit, there will be no rules in place.

Commissioner Jimmy Spain said he agreed with all the concerns and that he especially wanted to protect military interests.

Mele voted against holding a public hearing at this time, but was outnumbered 4 to 1 in a meeting in which Commissioners Carl Ollison and Pat Prescott were absent. Ollison, also a planning board member, did not attend the final planning board meeting in which the ordinance was finalized.

After the public hearing, the commissioners can vote on the ordinance, although a unanimous vote is required. If the vote is not unanimous, a second public hearing will be required and at that point a simple majority vote of commissioners can pass the ordinance.

Source:  By Charlie Hall, Sun Journal Staff | Published: Sunday, March 24, 2013 | www.newbernsj.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon