News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wind turbine plan rejected as harassment claims made  

Credit:  By Kay Taylor | Published on Wednesday 20 March 2013 | Leyland Guardian | www.leylandguardian.co.uk ~~

Developers have been accused of ‘harassing’ residents by submitting repeated applications for wind turbines in South Ribble.

Plans for four turbines, which would be seen from Midge Hall in Leyland, were turned down by the borough council’s planning committee last week.

Members said it was unfair for residents to keep having to fight plans for Chestnut House Farm in Wham Lane, Little Hoole, after they were first lodged last year and then withdrawn.

A tota of 275 people objected to the scheme, and the Ministry of Defence (MoD), BAE Systems and Blackpool Airport also opposed the plans because of worries the turbines, which are up to 150ft tall, could interfere with their aviation radar.

The committee had previously knocked back an application for a single turbine to provide renewable energy at the farm, which has now gone to appeal.

Two other turbine applications are also set to be determined by an independent planning inspector after being rejected by South Ribble’s committee, relating to plans in Whitestake and Penwortham.

Planning committee member Matthew Tomlinson said: “I have so much sympathy with residents who have to keep coming back to raise the same objections.

“The way I see it, as long as the MoD is opposed, I can’t see how we can possibly approve the plans, as a responsible committee.”

Coun Paul Foster said: “I am not opposed to turbines, but I have great sympathy with residents – this is bordering on harassment. How much longer can we accept these applications?”

Planning manager Helen Hockenhull responded: “The planning officers do have a right to refuse to deal with repeat plans, but often the developers make slight changes, and we have to deal with each one as a new application.”

Councillor for the Midge Hall area, Michael Green, said the turbines would affect residents in Leyland.

He added: “I don’t feel the economic benefits of wind turbines outweigh the loss of amenity to residents in this case.”

All members of the committee voted against the plans.

Source:  By Kay Taylor | Published on Wednesday 20 March 2013 | Leyland Guardian | www.leylandguardian.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.