LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

A. Barnett: Big Wind too noisy 

Credit:  Alice McKay Barnett, Carthage Sun Journal | March 17, 2013 | www.sunjournal.com ~~

On March 6, the Maine Supreme Court ruled for lower noise on Saddleback Ridge wind turbine project for “health” reasons. There was enough information on “adverse” health effects for the Board of Environmental Protection and the legislators to lower Maine’s nighttime noise limit to 42 dbA.

The World Health Organization has studied the noise issue and claims 35 dbA is the maximum level of tolerance for rural areas. Tech Environmental gave a report to Industry, Maine, based on the WHO recommendations. The report scaled height to setback distance, meaning that a 500-foot turbine would require a 7,000-foot setback to maintain a noise level of less than 35 dbA.

The Court had concerns about language in the Wind Energy Act, that a project should “reduce the potential for controversy regarding siting of grid scale wind …” and in “places where it is most compatible with existing patterns of development and resource values.” There are 34 residences – that is an existing pattern. Ten of them were built in the past five years. That is a pattern.

Most of these new homes were built because of natural resource value – spring water, wilderness, southern exposure and quiet. Many of those homes do not depend on “the grid” – they have solar panels on site. Many of those homeowners do not want to sell to the developer.

Most of the owners of those residences have no recourse unless the Department of Environmental Protection opens the application and all the new revisions are presented to the public.

Source:  Alice McKay Barnett, Carthage Sun Journal | March 17, 2013 | www.sunjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky