LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bat deaths documented 

Credit:  March 15, 2013 | www.wellandtribune.ca ~~

Re: Jim Bray, Questioning exploding bat lungs, The Tribune, Letter, March 13

If Mr. Bray had bothered to research the Divers Alert Network (DAN), one of the most respected dive organizations worldwide, or even consulted any of the dive certification organizations, such as PADI, NAUI, SSI, etc. he could have easily confirmed that ‘barotrauma’ is a real word.

It is used to describe pnuemothorax, air embolism and other decompression sicknesses. I do agree with him that purely relying on Wikepedia is not real ‘research’ so I have to wonder why he chose that way at all.

Wind energy worldwide, with existing technology, is a growing disaster, not just here in Ontario. There have been millions of bat deaths recorded worldwide.

It is possible some of those deaths, like those of the many birds killed, may have been caused by impact with a turbine blade. It is certainly recorded that in many cases the cause has been barotraumas, causing bats lungs to explode.

Like the wind energy companies Mr. Bray continues the myth that mechanical noise is the only noise issue with Industrial Wind Machines.

They continue to ignore the mounting evidence of serious long term and accumulative negative health effects caused by low frequency and infrasound of which a marked pressure fluctuation is an element.

Physics 101 should tell Mr. Bray that a turbine blade will only turn when wind hits one side. To convert that into the kinetic energy required there should be little or no ‘wind’ effect coming from the other side of the blade.

In fact if they ever could produce an efficient IWM there would be a near vacuum on the side away from the wind.

When high pressure is adjacent to low pressure under these conditions there is most certainly a large, continual and measurable pressure fluctuation created by these IWMs.

It is this effect that causes the noises that have been frequently described by some forced to live too close to IWMs as the persistent ‘whoosh, whoosh’ or the sound of ‘jet engines’.

Andrew Watts

Wainfleet

Source:  March 15, 2013 | www.wellandtribune.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky