[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Highland’s request rebuffed by PSC 

Credit:  By: Jeff Holmquist , Pierce County Herald | March 14, 2013 | www.piercecountyherald.com ~~

The developers of the proposed Highland Wind Farm are up against an important deadline, if their latest filings with the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin are to be believed.

But when Highland’s request for emergency reconsideration of its plan to install up to 44 industrial wind turbines in the Town of Forest went before the PSC March 1, the majority of the commissioners had little sympathy for the situation.

The PSC denied the application from Emerging Energies of Wisconsin, Highland’s developer, at its Feb. 14 meeting, citing inconclusive information about the wind farm’s ability to meet state standards related to noise from turbines.

But Highland quickly turned around and asked the PSC to look at the application again, noting that the PSC could approve the application on the condition that noise standards be met. Highland officials noted that they hoped to partner with Xcel Energy in an effort to make the wind farm project financially viable, but they claimed the deadline for that partnership was the end of March.

At the March 1 PSC meeting, Commissioner Ellen Nowak said the typical process for an emergency reconsideration usually does not occur until a final determination is finalized and published. The PSC’s previous denial had yet to become official.

“Nothing new has happened since our decision two weeks ago,” she said, suggesting that the PSC decision should continue to stand.

She also said she doubted that Highland will miss out on an opportunity to work with Xcel, but even if that’s what happens it’s not the PSC’s fault. Highland claimed it would lose its $2 million investment into the project if there was any further delay in the approval process.

“Loss of an economic investment is not a reason to grant an emergency petition,” Nowak said. “Risk of losing an investment is inherent in an endeavor such as this. Highland was aware of that risk when they increased the project size and moved it to our jurisdiction.”

PSC Chairman Phil Montgomery said he was inclined to deny the request for consideration, and a request for additional testimony. He said the PSC staff should continue to work on the final decision and related paperwork from Feb. 14.

Commissioner Eric Callisto disagreed. He said Highland finds itself in a “unique situation” and the PSC has sided with previous project applicants who faced similar dilemmas.

If the project was allowed to move forward, with conditions that noise standards be met, both Xcel and its customers would benefit, Callisto said.

He suggested the PSC approve the request, and allow the opponents of the Highland project to submit additional testimony until March 13. Then the PSC could act on the matter at its next meeting March 25.

In the end, the commission voted 2-1 to deny the emergency reconsideration request. Callisto cast the lone dissenting vote.

In response to the decision, Jay Mundinger, founding principal for Highland, said the company continues to explore its options on possible next steps.

“The delay in the approval process has jeopardized a current Xcel proposal that we have been working to complete,” he said. “However we are confident that eventually this project will be approved and built.”

Mundinger said the developers continue to believe that sound standards can be met by powering down the turbines at night. He said turbine operations would rarely have to be curtailed to reduce noise levels, however.

Brenda Salseg, a member of The Forest Voice, a citizens group opposed to the Highland project, said she continues to be pleased with the PSC’s decisions.

She added, however, that the fight likely isn’t over.

“Should the wind developer decide to continue to pursue our township, Forest Voice members and supporters will stand ready to defend their homes and fight for everyone’s constitutional and human rights,” she said.

Source:  By: Jeff Holmquist , Pierce County Herald | March 14, 2013 | www.piercecountyherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon