[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

McCaskill wants update on Energy Department’s grant management 

Credit:  Federal Eye | Posted by Josh Hicks on March 11, 2013 | www.washingtonpost.com ~~

The chairman of a Senate subcommittee has asked the Energy Department to show its progress toward better managing its clean-energy grants after an inspector general raised concerns about the program last month.

Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), who heads the Senate Subcommittee on Financial and Contracting Oversight, wrote to Energy Secretary Steven Chu on Thursday requesting a response by March 29.

McCaskill on Thursday also asked U.S. Comptroller General Gene Dodaro to examine the State Department’s rules on grants.

An inspector general’s report last month showed that the Energy Department had awarded $150 million in Recovery Act funds to a Michigan-based battery manufacturer that failed to produce any cells for vehicles sold to the public – it was supposed to create enough cells to equip 60,000 vehicles a year.

The company, LG Chem Michigan, also asked the government to reimburse it for labor costs incurred while the battery plant was idle and workers were playing games, watching movies and volunteering with local organizations, the report said.

Energy Department Inspector General Gregory H. Friedman questioned more than $1.6 million in costs submitted by the company.

The report said the Energy Department failed to take corrective action after learning that the battery-manufacturing project was not on track and appeared headed toward cost overruns.

LG Chem defended its work after the audit, saying the company had invested $150 million in its plants and “has a significant interest in the long-term success of this facility.”

The Energy Department agreed to stricter monitoring but defended its performance overall, telling the inspector general that “emerging technologies and industries often face struggles early on.”

McCaskill said in her letter to Dodaro: “I am troubled by the potential for overcharges, improper billing and other areas of potential fraud that may be occurring as a result of lax oversight.”

The LG Chem audit represents the latest bit of bad news in a string of negative developments tied to the Obama administration’s $80 billion clean-technology initiative, which came as part of the Recovery Act.

In 2011, solar-panel manufacturer Solyndra, which received $535 million in loan guarantees from the Energy Department, collapsed and was raided by FBI agents as Democratic lawmakers questioned whether the firm had misled federal officials about its finances.

The government is likely to recover just $24 million of the funds that taxpayers lent to Solyndra, according to the company’s final liquidation report.

In January, an electric car start-up and its sister company sued the Energy Department, alleging that the Energy Department and Chu had awarded money to politically favored firms.

President Obama’s program to invest federal funds in clean-energy start-up companies became a rallying cry for Republicans during the 2012 election.

Source:  Federal Eye | Posted by Josh Hicks on March 11, 2013 | www.washingtonpost.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon