Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind farm debate blows up
Credit: Aaron Langmaid | 9 March 2013 | Herald Sun | ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Premiere Denis Napthine could secure hundreds of jobs and millions of dollars worth of investment in his own electorate by easing wind farm restrictions.
But critics warned of a fierce confrontation if he reversed strict rules laid down by his predecessor, Ted Baillieu, who enforced the nation’s most restrictive wind turbine policies.
“Dr Napthine holds the key to securing the future of his own (South West Coast) electorate,” Steve Garner, the boss of Portland engineering firm Keppel Prince, said yesterday.
“Denis had to toe the party line on renewable energy, but we like to think he will be able to make a difference and help lock in the future of the south-west.”
But lawyer Randell Bell, president of Victorian Landscape Guardians, said wind power was unhealthy, inefficient and ineffective.
“Mr Baillieu’s policy was the best in the world,” he said. “He understood the fallacies of the industry.
“If Dr Napthine reneges on that policy, I’ll break his arms.”
Dr Napthine did not respond to inquiries on the subject yesterday.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: