LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

What price wind power? 

Credit:  The Guardian | March 9, 2013 | www.theguardian.pe.ca ~~

As P.E.I. taxpayers grapple with its staggering $2.4-billion debt, the Macdonald-Laurier Institute points out that the province pays the highest bond rates in the country, and it is the most likely province to default on its loans.

Meanwhile, Wes Sheridan and Energy Corporation chief Wayne MacQuarrie have the province poised to borrow another $60 million to construct a second wind turbine facility in north-eastern P.E.I. All in the interest, we are promised, of keeping electricity costs down – costs that are already the highest in the country.

Keep in mind that in October 2008, Robert Ghiz promised to make the province a wind energy powerhouse that would export electricity to New England. The $1-billion investment would be the biggest project since the Confederation Bridge.

Alas, between the dream and the reality lay the true costs.

Energy companies came, looked at the economics, and quickly left. No problem, said Mr. Ghiz and cabinet, we have our own in-house renewable energy experts, and we’ll go italone. On borrowed money. Hence the East Point development. And now a second one is in the works, moved out of East Point because the community did not want it.

Legislators and taxpayers must demand a full accounting from Messrs. Sheridan and MacQuarrie of the true costs of each kilowatt produced at East Point. And ask hard questions about the debt-servicing costs, the much-lower-than-promised output, and the high equipment failure rate. Is this good value for [borrowed] money?

Then they can compare the true costs with the lofty pre-construction promises before asking “Why the huge difference? And why would we borrow even more money to do this again?”

P.E.I. simply cannot afford this new proposal, which will saddle beleaguered taxpayers for generations to come.

Taxpayers and MLAs need to get on this file – and soon – for the sake of our kids and grandchildren.

Joe Mullally,

Ottawa, Ont.

Big Pond, P.E.I. (summer)

Source:  The Guardian | March 9, 2013 | www.theguardian.pe.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky