Bill would let energy companies remove nests and eggs, exempt companies from penalties for killing eagles, hawks and other raptors
Wildlife experts are reacting with outrage to AB 516, a bill in the California Legislature that would allow energy and utility companies to obtain “take” permits authorizing destruction of birds, eggs and nest that stand in the way of electrical transmission infrastructure.
SDG&E was caught flying helicopters too close to protected eagle nests at least four times during construction of Sunrise Powerlink. Those incursions in three East County locations resulted in removal of one pilot and suspension of others, as well as grounding, GPS tracking and other regulatory enforcement actions. But if this bills go through, such activities could occur without penalty in the future.
Multiple new electrical transmission projects are planned in East County, including substations and industrial wind projects, each with new transmission lines. Some are planned in or very near to golden eagle habitat.
The Riverside Press Enterprise reports that nests built by five pairs of red-tailed hawks on power poles near the Nevada border last year forced Southern California Edison crews to stop work within 400 feet of the nests. As this year’s nesting season approaches, Assemblywoman Cheryl Brown (D-Rialto) introduced AB 516 to allow energy companies to “take” birds.
The Riverside newspaper indicates that could include nest removal, though the term “take” legally means a developer will face no penalties if a bird inadvertently dies as a result of the project.
“Any work around these nests could easily be delayed until late June after the young have left their nests,” Jim Wiegand, a wildlife biologist, told East County Magazine. “This bill reeks with ulterior wind energy motives and should be killed.” He added that Southern California Edison wind turbines hat slaughtered countless numbers of raptors.
Raptors, including hawks, owls, falcons and eagles, have long been protected under California law and killing endangered or threatened species also carries federal protections. In nearly all other cases (with the exception of motorists accidentally striking a bird), killing a raptor is a felony that is enforceable with severe penalties.
But recently, the U.S. Department of the Interior has begun issuing take permits to give wind energy developers immunity from prosecution if they kill a limited number of raptors including eagles. Now the state may follow suit under the guise of pushing forward “renewable” energy that some environmentalists say are harming the balance of nature by enabling the destruction of raptors that not only fall victim to electrocution from power lines and death by striking wind turbine blades, but now also appear to be losing protection even for raising their young in their nesting sites.
The Canadian government drew outrage when it authorized removal of an active bald eagle nest by Iberdrola Renewables during construction of a wind project, as ECM reported in January. Iberdrola is the developer of Tule Wind approved by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management in McCain Valley, where eagle take permits may also be issued, much to the dismay of residents who have fought against the controversial project.
San Diego’s golden eagle population has declined dramatically in recent years, falling at least 50%. Estimates on the number left range from a high of 48 nesting pairs to perhaps as few as 10 – with the higher estimates made by a consultant hired by the wind industry,
San Diego Loves Green recently predicted that if the most dire figures are true and wind development is allowed in remaining eagle territories in East County, San Diego’s eagle population may soon become extinct.
|Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding