News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Wildlife: Bill would let power companies evict birds  

Credit:  BY DAVID DANELSKI, STAFF WRITER | March 07, 2013 | The Press-Enterprise | www.pe.com ~~

An Inland legislator hopes to give commercial solar energy projects a boost by getting nesting birds out of the way.

The problem is that red-tailed hawks and other birds like to build nests and raise their young high up on utility poles or towers. Under current regulations, workers can’t disturb nesting birds when they are upgrading or installing new lines, a situation that has delayed some efforts to link solar and wind energy projects to the power grid.

Nests built by five pairs of red-tailed hawks on power poles near the Nevada border last year forced Southern California Edison crews to stop work within 400 feet of the nests.

The crews were upgrading power lines needed for BrightSource Energy’s 5.6-square-mile solar project under construction in northeastern San Bernardino County. Work near the nests stopped for as long as five months, until the hawks and their progeny moved on.

With this year’s nesting season approaching, Assemblywoman Cheryl Brown, D-Rialto, has introduced a bill that would make life easier for alternative-energy developers. The bill would allow energy companies to obtain state permits to move – or “take” – birds, nests or eggs that are in the way of transmission line projects “to help achieve the state’s renewable energy goals.”

“Take,” in wildlife regulation-speak, means kill, injure or harass.

“The goal is not to hurt the birds,” said Shannon McKinley, Brown’s legislative director. “The goal is to move the birds safely so the projects can continue.”

Southern California Edison officials had approached Brown to sponsor bill, and Brown’s office has been working with the company on the bill, McKinley said. The current version is a placeholder that is expected to be clarified and rewritten before hearings are held, she added.

Edison provided Brown with a $1,500 campaign donation on Dec. 31, two months after she was elected to the Assembly, according to secretary of state records. McKinley said she did not have any information about the donation, and Brown was traveling and unavailable for comment.

Edison officials could not be reached for comment on the legislation.

Raptors frequently nest in power transmission towers. In eastern Riverside County, Edison crews sometimes put beach balls in high spots to discourage the birds from building nests, said David Briery, spokesman for the U.S. Bureau of Land Management.

Ileene Anderson, a biologist with the Tucson-based Center for Biological Diversity, said she doubts that nests can be moved without harming birds. Once a nest is displaced, most birds would abandon the chicks or eggs, she said, adding that she has never heard of a raptor raising young in a nest that had been moved.

The proposed state legislation may not be legally sound, Anderson said. Red-tailed hawks and several other species of migratory birds are protected by federal law.

Utility companies may have another problem, too. Hawks have powerful, sharp claws and beaks and are well known for attacking anyone who tries to disturb or get close to their nests, Anderson said.

Source:  BY DAVID DANELSKI, STAFF WRITER | March 07, 2013 | The Press-Enterprise | www.pe.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Wildlife

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.