| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Offshore wind bill passes in Maryland Senate, heads back to House
Credit: Mar 08, 2013 | www.wbaltv.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
A measure to help develop a wind project off the coast of Ocean City by requiring electricity suppliers to buy offshore renewable energy credits passed the Maryland Senate on Friday.
The measure that passed 30-15 has been a priority for Gov. Martin O’Malley, who pushed unsuccessfully for the bill for two years before finally finding success with a scaled-back proposal. The bill was already passed this session by the House of Delegates, which will only have to sign off on several small changes the Senate made before sending it off to O’Malley to sign.
Environmental groups cheered the vote. Mike Tidwell, executive director of the Chesapeake Climate Action Network, described it as a significant victory for clean energy.
“This bill is to offshore wind power in the Mid-Atlantic what the early railroads were to American transportation,” Tidwell said in a statement. “It’s a driver of innovation that will create jobs, enhance our economy, improve public health and protect the climate.”
The proposal, which will take years to develop, would increase monthly electricity bills for ratepayers by an estimated $1.50 a month. Commercial ratepayers could see increases of up to 1.5 percent.
Republican critics denounced the measure for increasing electricity bills in order to develop the world’s most expensive forms of electricity.
“This is not the path,” said Sen. E.J. Pipkin, R-Cecil. “This is a private enrichment bill. Our citizens deserve better than this from us, and that’s why, ladies and gentlemen, I believe this is the dumbest idea ever.”
But supporters underscored ratepayers would only pay for energy they receive, not infrastructure involved in the project. Ratepayers also would only pay once they started receiving electricity from offshore wind.
“Maryland ratepayers, Maryland taxpayers, have absolutely no connection to this project except for a purchase of power,” said Sen. Thomas Middleton, D-Charles. “That’s all we’re purchasing.”
The Public Service Commission has a year to develop regulations. The earliest a developer could propose is project is July 2014. The O’Malley administration estimates 2017 is the earliest a project could be up and running.
O’Malley has noted challenges clearly remain to get the project off the ground. Still, he has expressed confidence the measure will put Maryland on track to partner with neighboring states to lead an offshore wind project off the East Coast.
A scaled-back version of O’Malley’s initial bill passed the House of Delegates last year, but stalled in the Senate Finance Committee. This year, Senate President Thomas V. Mike Miller moved a member of the panel to another committee to secure the vote needed to get the measure to the Senate floor for a debate.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Paypal) |
 (via Stripe) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=34306 ]
