| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind moratorium won’t make it out of committee
Credit: By Sam Evans-Brown | New Hampshire Public Radio | March 5, 2013 | www.nhpr.org ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
New Hampshire’s legislature will not put a moratorium on new wind projects… at least not now. Today a house committee voted to work on the bill over the summer.
Several members of the Science, Technology and Energy committee, like Meredith Republican Herbert Vadney, indicated support for a moratorium, because of the controversy bubbling around Newfound Lake.
Before the vote Vadney said, “we have some sites right now that are under threat, but we could retain this and not come up with an answer for quite some time and it would be too late for the people of Newfound Lake.”
But in the end, arguments like those of Barrington Democrat Ken Grossman won out. “The issues that underlie this bill have so much merit that we really need to take the additional time necessary to get this just right,” said Grossman, to explain his position.
They voted 14 to 5 keep the bill in committee over the summer. Those voting to retain included the bill’s primary sponsor, Skip Reilly. The five nay votes came from Republicans, though two GOP reps voted with the Democratic majority to support retention.
In the meantime the lawmakers have sent a letter to the Site Evaluation Committee, which decides whether to approve new energy projects, asking them to update and rewrite the rules on wind farm permitting, to make the process more comprehensive.
Northern Pass Bills Retained Too
The committee also voted to retain another six bills aimed at changing how the SEC operates, including some inspired by the Northern Pass project. Some of the proposals included a moratorium on new transmission projects, requiring transmission-lines to be buried, and requiring the consent of the towns affected before granting the permit for a new energy facility.
Manchester Democrat Nick Levasseur voted with the majority to hold the bills in committee over the summer, slapping the table and saying “It shows the business community that New Hampshire has a changeable and fickle government that would have policies in place to develop an entire sector, then the second it starts stops it.”
Lawmakers will work on the bills over the summer, combining them into one bill that reforms the Site Evaluation Committee, the regulators that decide whether to grant permits to new energy projects.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=34180 ]
