LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

No-go for turbines farm on East Lancashire moors 

Credit:  The Citizen | 5 March 2013 | www.chorleycitizen.co.uk ~~

Five new 125metre-high wind turbines on the moors above Burnley, Bacup and Todmorden have been rejected by planning bosses.

The controversial wind farm proposed by Kelda Water, a subsidiary of Yorkshire Water, had provoked outrage among conservationists.

But planning chiefs in Calderdale believed the turbines – the latest in a series of wind farms across the South Pennines – were a step too far.

Towering structures have already been approved in recent years for locations including Reaps Moss, Crook Hill and Todmorden Moor.

Planning head Geoff Willerton said in a decision notice: “The proposed turbines would have significant adverse cumulative landscape impacts, when read against the consented wind turbines at Reaps Moss, Crook Hill and Todmoden Moor.”

In his ruling he said the accepted benefits from the turbines, and their benefits regarding climate change, did not outweigh the effect on the moorland setting.

The turbines, for land to the south of Gorpley Reservoir, off Bacup Road, Todmorden, like similar developments at Cliviger, near Burnley, and Scout Moor, in Rossendale, would be visible for miles around, according to protesters.

Planning official Alan Rogan, speaking on behalf of Burnley Council, joined local farmers and walkers in opposing the scheme.

Mr Rogan said: “For Burnley the main impact would be visual, and the consequent impact on long-distance recreational footpaths along this part of the Pennines.

“On that basis it is considered that significant weight should be given to any negative cumulative impact on the landscape and its visual amenities.”

Applicants Kelda Water are said to be considering the possibility of lodging an appeal against the council’s decision.

Source:  The Citizen | 5 March 2013 | www.chorleycitizen.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon