[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

No-go for turbines farm on East Lancashire moors  

Credit:  The Citizen | 5 March 2013 | www.chorleycitizen.co.uk ~~

Five new 125metre-high wind turbines on the moors above Burnley, Bacup and Todmorden have been rejected by planning bosses.

The controversial wind farm proposed by Kelda Water, a subsidiary of Yorkshire Water, had provoked outrage among conservationists.

But planning chiefs in Calderdale believed the turbines – the latest in a series of wind farms across the South Pennines – were a step too far.

Towering structures have already been approved in recent years for locations including Reaps Moss, Crook Hill and Todmorden Moor.

Planning head Geoff Willerton said in a decision notice: “The proposed turbines would have significant adverse cumulative landscape impacts, when read against the consented wind turbines at Reaps Moss, Crook Hill and Todmoden Moor.”

In his ruling he said the accepted benefits from the turbines, and their benefits regarding climate change, did not outweigh the effect on the moorland setting.

The turbines, for land to the south of Gorpley Reservoir, off Bacup Road, Todmorden, like similar developments at Cliviger, near Burnley, and Scout Moor, in Rossendale, would be visible for miles around, according to protesters.

Planning official Alan Rogan, speaking on behalf of Burnley Council, joined local farmers and walkers in opposing the scheme.

Mr Rogan said: “For Burnley the main impact would be visual, and the consequent impact on long-distance recreational footpaths along this part of the Pennines.

“On that basis it is considered that significant weight should be given to any negative cumulative impact on the landscape and its visual amenities.”

Applicants Kelda Water are said to be considering the possibility of lodging an appeal against the council’s decision.

Source:  The Citizen | 5 March 2013 | www.chorleycitizen.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter