News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Kingston BOH majority would dump resolution on select board  

Credit:  By Kathryn Gallerani | Wicked Local Kingston | Posted Mar 01, 2013 | www.wickedlocal.com ~~

KINGSTON – Last week, the Board of Health voted 3-2 to ask selectmen if they would consider contacting the owners of the Independence wind turbine about the possibility of entering into what BOH Chairman Joe Casna described as meaningful negotiations with the town regarding mitigation.

Selectmen were never presented that initiative after Leland Road resident Sean Reilly protested the decision, urging the board not to consider it. While he initially supported it, Reilly said he had since found out what it really means – closed doors and private meetings.

“Upon further reflection, I strongly object to any such process,” he said. “The last thing those of us who have been suffering need is a lack of transparency.”

Any remedy that addresses the health impacts of the turbine is under the jurisdiction of the Board of Health, he said, and should be decided by that board.

“Our health and well-being should never be negotiable,” he said.

Board of Health members Dan Sapir and Jack Breen voted against making this request.

After the meeting, Sapir said Casna’s proposal was a mistake, and so was the vote.

“He’s undermining the authority of a board he sits on,” he said. “As a selectman he was part of the negotiations that created this monster.”

Responding to this complaint, Casna, who also chairs the Board of Selectmen, said Sapir was grandstanding by criticizing an initiative he put forth in good faith.

“I’m trying to handle this in a responsible manner,” he said.

Thursday night, Breen said Kingston Wind Independence co-owner Kially Ruiz has made it clear that his company is waiting until the planned sound study has been completed to respond to any requests.

After the Board of Health meeting, Casna contacted town counsel to discuss the board’s vote. Casna said he still planned to present his proposal to selectmen Tuesday night despite counsel strongly advising against it but decided against it after Reilly spoke.

He said he will report back to the Board of Health and may suggest the board reconsider its vote.

Also Tuesday night, Doreen Reilly questioned selectmen about a vote they took in December. She says the vote was to direct the Board of Health to take the “strongest possible action” to provide a remedy to residents who are impacted by the turbine, yet that wasn’t the content of a letter to the board.

At that same meeting, selectmen voted to shut down the Independence and Mary O’Donnell’s three turbines at least temporarily until the results of a sound study could be analyzed but then quickly rescinded that decision.

Selectman Susan Munford suggested the board look into Reilly’s complaint, saying there may have been “a fear of us saying the wrong thing” when the letter was sent.

“I am looking at this as simply, we said we’d do something and we didn’t do it,” she said.

Other board members agreed to this approach. However, Selectman Sandy MacFarlane recused herself, having consulting with the Ethics Commission because she has a distant relative who is a complainant.

Reilly also complained of inaction on the part of the Board of Health to mitigate residents’ health concerns and improper citing of the turbine.

Source:  By Kathryn Gallerani | Wicked Local Kingston | Posted Mar 01, 2013 | www.wickedlocal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.