| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
New Hartford board still considering wind turbines
Credit: By AMANDA FRIES | Observer-Dispatch | Posted Feb 24, 2013 | www.uticaod.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
NEW HARTFORD – After the town board voted down wind legislation last July, New Hartford officials are back at the drawing board.
“At the last board meeting, the board felt that we should try and hire an attorney that has this specific expertise, which I don’t have, in dealing with this wind legislation,” New Hartford Town Attorney Herbert Cully said.
A committee was formed to collect information, and they proposed an ordinance, which classified three types of windmills: large, with a maximum height of 500 feet; small, with a maximum height of 180 feet; and residential, with a maximum height of 50 feet.
The proposal also included criteria for issues such as visual impact, noise, electromagnetic interference, avian impact, and fiscal and economic impact.
After the board voted it down 4-1, they went back to work looking at other legislation, such as the one the town of Litchfield passed last March banning construction of industrial wind turbines. Officials have said that smaller, domestic turbines – no more than 120 feet tall and 50 kilowatts or less – are permitted.
After reading through the legislation, Cully said he advised that another attorney be brought in.
“I was concerned because in looking at the detail, I can’t understand it,” he said. “I’m going to contact a couple attorneys to see if they specialize in this area.”
Cully said he plans on bringing what he finds to the next board meeting March 13.
Town Supervisor Patrick Tyksinski said that while the town hasn’t received any wind turbine construction proposals, officials wanted to be proactive.
“We don’t want large windmill farms popping up close to residential neighborhoods,” he said.
A lawsuit was filed late last year by 60 Middleville, Fairfield and Norway residents against the entities responsible for construction of the Hardscrabble Wind Farm.
Among the complaints, the lawsuit asserts that those responsible for the construction of the wind farm were negligent in assessing the site to determine whether it was properly suited for the project, and that the 450-foot turbines are a public and private nuisance.
Tyksinski said the town plans to have a public hearing on a potential wind ordinance March 27.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=33812 ]
