[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

NSP: Wind farm delay would be costly 

Credit:  By JOANN ALBERSTAT Business Reporter | The Chronicle Herald | February 21, 2013 | thechronicleherald.ca ~~

Regulator told utility wouldn’t be immune from any penalties on South Canoe project

Nova Scotia Power would have to pay itself a penalty if the South Canoe wind farm doesn’t begin operating on schedule, the provincial regulator was told Thursday.

A utility executive vice-president testified that the power company would have to pay its share of any liquidated damages that the Lunenburg County project would owe if the project is delayed. South Canoe has a 20-year contract to begin selling electricity to Nova Scotia Power by Jan. 1, 2015.

“Nova Scotia Power can’t be excused from penalties because it’s contracted with itself,” Robin McAdam said during a Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board hearing on the wind farm.

Oxford Frozen Foods and Hantsport’s Minas Basin Pulp and Power are the lead partners on the $200-million project.

Nova Scotia Power owns a 49 per cent share of the New Ross-area venture.

The 102-megawatt project was approved last August by the province’s renewable electricity administrator, beating out 16 other proposed wind farms across the province.

The utility is asking the board to allow its $93-million share of the capital cost of South Canoe to be included in rates.

Board member Roberta Clarke, who is chairing the three-member panel hearing the case, pressed McAdam for details about the penalty provision, which is a standard part of power purchase agreements, but she didn’t receive many answers.

“I’m just trying to think logistically how that would work,” Clarke remarked.

McAdam, who leads the utility’s strategic business and customer services, said the South Canoe partners plan to have the wind farm operating by the end of 2014 to avoid any penalties.

“I’m a big fan of on-time completion of construction,” he told the hearing.

According to a draft version of the contract made public in June, the South Canoe owners would have to pay a $15,300 fine for every day that the project is late. Nova Scotia Power’s share would be $7,497 while Oxford and Minas Basin would cover the remaining $7,803.

The hearing, which began Wednesday, continued in camera Thursday afternoon.

Nova Scotia Power has asked the board for a decision by March 31, saying turbines need to be ordered soon to meet the Jan. 1, 2015, deadline.

South Canoe’s owners have a supply agreement with Acciona Windpower North America to provide 34 three-megawatt turbines. Service and warranty agreements have also been negotiated with Acciona, a subsidiary of a Spanish renewable energy company.

Panel member Murray Doehler asked Nova Scotia Power officials why the project wasn’t filed with the board until December, four months after South Canoe was approved by the administrator.

“You’re making us hurry hard to get the thing out and done by the end of March,” Doehler said. “To quote Queen Victoria, we’re not amused.”

McAdam said contracts took longer to negotiate than expected.

“We felt it was important to nail those down to support the application.”

Other wind developers have cried foul over Nova Scotia Power’s bid to include the project in rates. A group of six developers, whose bids were rejected by the administrator, have told the board that the utility, not ratepayers, should bear the risk of any cost overruns or unforeseen expenses related to South Canoe.

Besides the $93-million capital cost, Nova Scotia Power will also be asking the regulator to approve $23 million in transmission and system upgrades needed for the wind farm.

Source:  By JOANN ALBERSTAT Business Reporter | The Chronicle Herald | February 21, 2013 | thechronicleherald.ca

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky