[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

We would be paying for RICL’s folly 

Credit:  Morris Daily Herald | February 21, 2013 | www.morrisdailyherald.com ~~

Lately, I’ve been hearing the term “Bridge to Nowhere” used in reference to the 500-mile-long DC transmission line the private company Rock Island Clean Line is proposing across Iowa and Illinois prime farmland.

The phrase refers to the fear RICL will get this power line erected at the rate of $2,000 per mile only to find it has no western “clean energy” to transmit or no market to sell expensive electricity to on the eastern end.

Some people say, ”No big deal! It will just mean venture capitalists, a billionaire in Texas and three billionaire brothers from Park Avenue, New York City, will have made a poor investment choice and will have to suffer the economic consequences.”

The problem is we taxpayers and land owners will be the big losers. If RICL succeeds at the Illinois Commerce Commission and gets public utility status that they are requesting through docket 12-0560, RICL will also have a right-of-way contract that says there is an easement 200 feet wide through fields for perpetuity.

It won’t matter if RICL goes under, they would still own right-of-ways across Illinois and Iowa forever and could rent or resell for other power lines or pipelines. That farm land would be unavailable for development forever.

For advocates of clean energy, that also means no wind turbines could be erected on those 12,000 acres of easement, and actually it would take out 24,000 acres, as 200-foot power poles would have to have 200-foot clearance on each side in case they ever fell over.

The land’s value would be depreciated forever, forcing tax rates for others to go up to make up for the counties’ loss of revenue.

Productivity of the land would also suffer, as aerial spraying, irrigation, weed control, compaction, and drainage would be compromised.

As world population grows, placing a larger demand on food producers, can we afford to remove fertile land from production for a “private company’s folly?”

www.BlockRICL.com is an informative website you can go to learn more about this issue affecting all of us.

Jeanette Carothers – Earlville, Ill.

Source:  Morris Daily Herald | February 21, 2013 | www.morrisdailyherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky