| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
CC-E to open bids for wind turbine purchase
Credit: By Kate Padilla, Daily Reporter Staff | February 21, 2013 | www.spencerdailyreporter.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
After discussing collected bids for replacing their wind turbine with a remanufactured identical model, the Clay Central-Everly school board voted to reject the bids and open the turbine up for public purchase.
“If we reject all of the bids, we can advertise it for sale. We get rid of it,” Board President Scott Rinehart said.
“As a school, we should be focusing on children and education and not about a wind turbine,” board member Curt Langner said.
Two bids were submitted to replace the existing turbine. BroadWind Services would install a Micon 108 model for $210,000. Harold Prior, owner of First Priority Consulting Group and executive director of the Iowa Wind Energy Association, noted purchasing the Micon 108 model would void the district’s 33-year agreement with Alliant Energy.
Broadwind Services also bid to dismantle the existing wind turbine for $37,600.
The second bid to replace the turbine came from Talk, Inc., for $109,000. This bid included a one-year complete warranty and a $1500 maintenance package for five years.
“We’d take an oil sample every year, and change out the gear box every five years,” Talk, Inc. President Adam Suelflow said. “Ninety-five percent of the maintenance is visual inspection. There’s not a whole lot to it, but we’d want to catch something before it breaks.”
Prior noted Talk, Inc. has performed over 100 installations, including 15 in Alaska.
“The vast majority of our work is remanufacture,” Suelflow said. “When we build a machine, we want it to last 20 to 30 years. We don’t want to have to keep traveling up to Alaska for maintenance issues.”
Suelflow continued. “Obviously, I’m in the business of installing and running turbines. But it would be a shame to see a good concrete pad and all of the electrical work go to waste. I’d love to see the turbine run again.”
“Our goal was to help solve a problem,” Prior said, “however that problem needed to be solved.”
A majority vote approved opening the turbine to the public for sale. Board member Dave Saboe opposed the motion.
“It’s the safest option,” Board Member Brian Schmidt said.
“We’re not in the power business,” Rinehart said. “We’re in the education business.”
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=33691 ]
