[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind farm opponents speak in favor of moratorium  

Credit:  Feb 19, 2013 | www.wmur.com ~~

Hundreds of people showed up Tuesday for a hearing on a bill that would put a moratorium on wind farm projects in the state.

Those supporting the moratorium heavily outnumbered those opposed to the bill. Many traveled from northern parts of the state to explain why they think the wind turbines aren’t a good fit for their communities.

“When does a private company in search of profit have more rights than the private citizen who owns property in the state of New Hampshire?” said bill supporter Paul Simard said. “That is the question.”

“This could be the death of our mountaintops and our tourism,” said bill supporter Pamela Charron.

Supporters of HB 580 wore orange in solidarity. They said new wind farms need to be halted until a comprehensive energy plan is established in New Hampshire.

“When you are dealing with planning – how do you locate it, set-backs, the noise, how many meters from a home – these are things that need to be worked out before New Hampshire jumps in and gets involved and starts destroying the scenery of many areas, especially up north,” said Rep. Al Baldasaro, R-Londonderry.

Some opposed to a moratorium said it would hurt their livelihood.

“It seems that in this economy, my earning power is shrinking over the past three or four years,” said electrician Douglas Bounds.

“It will stop investment in our state and kill jobs for the people I represent,” said Tyler Eaton, who represents union workers.

An attorney for Trans Canada, which owns local hydro dams, said the bill goes against New Hampshire’s own 2007 law that said the state should move toward renewable forms of energy to improve air quality and public health and mitigate climate change.

But many testified that the power lines and windmills will reduce their property values.

Another bill under consideration would require a public vote to allow such projects.

Source:  Feb 19, 2013 | www.wmur.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.