[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Keith turbine plans rejected  

Credit:  The Press and Journal | 20 February 2013 | ~~

Moray councillors refused yesterday two wind turbine proposals – after officers claimed they would have an “unacceptable” impact on the rural landscape.

Planning officers told the authority’s planning and regulatory services that the developments in the Keith area were contrary to the Moray Local Plan.

Proposals to build two 750kw turbines at Backmuir, Keith, were refused after officers claimed the visual impact would “detract from the character and appearance of the landscape”.

A report written by planning officer Neal MacPherson said the proposed 282ft turbines, together with the nearby operational and approved turbines at Edintore and Drummuir, “would lead to an unacceptable cumulative impact”. He said the structures would have an effect on people travelling along the A96 Inverness-Aberdeen road and from vantage points in the surrounding area, including Keith.

The report adds: “The combined effect would give rise to a landscape with a cluttered appearance, detrimentally affecting its rural character to an unacceptable degree.”

Meanwhile, plans for an 800kw turbine at Garralhill, Newmill, Keith, were also refused by councillors. Officers said the proposed turbine, measuring up to 242ft, “would inevitably appear as a prominent feature within the landscape, particularly when viewed from the surrounding countryside”.

Keith councillor Stewart Cree said that during a site visit to Garralhill, he had noticed a “huge variety” of turbines with “no symmetry or order”. He added: “It’s reaching the stage where the landscape has been affected enough.”

Source:  The Press and Journal | 20 February 2013 |

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter