LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Scituate couple withdraw wind turbine lawsuit against health board 

Credit:  By Patrick Ronan | The Patriot Ledger | Posted Feb 14, 2013 | www.patriotledger.com ~~

The Scituate couple who claim the wind turbine near their home is ruining their health have dropped a lawsuit against the town’s board of health.

Lauren and Mark McKeever last month pulled back the lawsuit they had filed in Brockton Superior Court asking a judge to order the board of health to shut down the wind turbine off the Driftway, 640 feet from their home. The McKeevers, who have two children, said the turbine’s noise and flicker is hurting their quality of life.

The couple said they withdrew the lawsuit in response to a judge’s order, but they reserve the right to re-file the claim pending a final decision on the turbine from the health board. Last month, the board ordered a limited noise study of the 390-foot-tall turbine.

The McKeevers are among dozens of residents in Scituate’s Third Cliff neighborhood who say the turbine, erected last year, has given them headaches and caused them to lose sleep.

“Once the Board of Health issues a decision on the complaints of the McKeevers and the other residents submitted by petition four months ago, we will make a determination as to whether or not to appeal that decision,” Tanya Trevisan, attorney for the McKeevers, said in a prepared statement.

At a court hearing last month, an attorney representing the health board said the McKeevers had signed an agreement with the turbine’s owner before it was erected in which the family received $20,000 in exchange for not contesting the turbine’s installation.

Trevisan said the agreement is not relevant to a lawsuit concerning the turbine’s health impact.

Source:  By Patrick Ronan | The Patriot Ledger | Posted Feb 14, 2013 | www.patriotledger.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon