[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

LePage administration right to oppose offshore wind project  

Credit:  By Patrick Woodcock | Portland Press Herald | February 3, 2013 | www.pressherald.com ~~

The vision from the LePage administration to lower energy costs is not only critical for businesses, it is central to hardworking Maine families. Mainers spend more than 50 percent more than the national average on household energy costs, and the administration does not support adding to this burden.

The editorial “PUC offshore wind call right for Maine’s future” (Jan. 27) lauding the Public Utilities Commission’s approval of Statoil’s pilot project was way off the mark by claiming the administration “pressured” the commission to vote one way or another.

The Governor’s Energy Office submitted written comments raising significant concerns regarding costs to Maine ratepayers as well as the administration’s determination that this energy giant has failed to demonstrate specific investments in Maine’s economy as the law requires. The letter is part of the public record.

If the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram is establishing this as the standard for pressure, then by that logic the PUC bowed to the pressure of one recently elected federal official, large construction companies and environmental groups, as well as a multinational oil company – all of which submitted supportive comments. This is far from “political pressure” – this is public debate.

The administration will continue to raise substantive concerns that this project increases electricity bills, hinders the University of Maine from developing an alternative pilot project at a lower cost, and fails to provide assurances that our manufacturing sector will receive capital investments that will increase long-term employment in Maine.

The truth is that the project’s benefits to Maine are ambiguous, while the costs to our state are clear and real – nearly $200 million will need to be subsidized by Maine families and businesses. This is the wrong direction for developing a new industry and antithetical to improving Maine’s business climate and reducing the energy bill burdens on Maine families.

Patrick Woodcock is the director of the Governor’s Energy Office.

Source:  By Patrick Woodcock | Portland Press Herald | February 3, 2013 | www.pressherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.