[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Number of wind hearings ‘beyond extreme’  

Credit:  BY DAVID GIULIANI | January 30, 2013 | www.saukvalley.com ~~

DIXON – Lee County’s zoning panel has held 24 hearings on a proposed wind farm. Three more are planned for next week.

The first was July 5. That was more than a month before Mitt Romney chose his vice presidential running mate. Since, Romney lost the election, and President Barack Obama started his new term.

So far, the Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals has logged 60 hours of hearings for the wind farm. By comparison, Nicholas Sheley’s Whiteside County murder trial last year took about 40 hours over more than a week.

Ireland-based Mainstream Renewable Power is asking for special-use permits for 53 turbines in Lee County’s southwestern corner. The turbines would be part of a three-county wind farm.

In August, Whiteside County approved nine turbines after 4 months of hearings. Bureau County held 21 hearings from March to November, but its zoning board rejected the proposal. The company plans to submit a new application.

For previous Lee County wind farms, hearings lasted just one night.

In recent years, however, opposition to wind farms has grown. Residents object to their noise, shadow flicker and appearance. They also worry that companies will abandon turbines eventually, doing nothing to take them down.

Under the county’s procedures, every resident has the right to cross-examine witnesses and give closing statements. The witnesses have included experts on noise and wind turbines’ impact on neighboring property values.

Next week, the zoning board will hold hearings 3 nights in a row, allowing residents to give closing statements. No one is sure whether that will be enough time for all residents to speak.

The zoning board’s hearings are run by retired Whiteside County Judge Tim Slavin. He operates under the board’s procedures, which allow residents much time to question witnesses and make their cases.

One industry expert says 24 hearings for one wind farm is unusually high.

“That’s way beyond extreme, in our experience,” said Harold Prior, executive director of the Iowa Wind Energy Association. “There must be some organized opposition [in Lee County]. I can’t cite a single instance in the last 3 to 5 years that was really contentious.”

The same type of opposition is seen involving proposed electricity transmission lines cutting through Iowa and Illinois, including northern Bureau County.

“The public meetings in Iowa [for the lines] are absolutely tame compared to those in Illinois,” Prior said.

In Illinois, many residents near the proposed route for the lines have put up signs in protest.

Franklin Grove Village President Bob Logan, who regularly attends zoning board meetings, said the panel may be among the best educated in Illinois.

“I don’t know where a zoning board has been presented so much information,” Logan said. “Very rarely would you find that level of expert witnesses come to hearings.”

After the zoning board makes a recommendation on the wind farm, the Lee County Board will have the final say.

To attend

The Lee County Zoning Board of Appeals will meet at 7 p.m. Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday on the third floor of the Old Lee County Courthouse, 112 E. Second St. in Dixon. Each meeting is expected to last 2 1/2 hours.

The board will resume its public hearing for Mainstream Renewable Power’s application for turbines in the southwestern area of the county.

For an agenda for this meeting, minutes and transcripts from past meetings, or more information, go to www.leecountyil.com or call 815-288-5676.

Source:  BY DAVID GIULIANI | January 30, 2013 | www.saukvalley.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.