[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Endangered wading bird key to giant island development case 

Credit:  David Ross, Highland Correspondent | The Herald | 28 January 2013 | www.heraldscotland.com ~~

An endangered wading bird is central to a legal action opening at the Court of Session tomorrow against a giant island wind farm.

Sustainable Shetland is seeking judicial review of the decision of Scottish Ministers in April to grant consent for the Viking Energy wind farm on the Shetland mainland.

The original plan for 150 turbines was initially reduced to 127 after consultations and then the Scottish Government reduced the number further to 103 to resolve an issue regarding Scatsta airport.

The 850-strong campaign group says ministers could not reasonably have established the scientific facts over the protection of the Whimbrel bird without an inquiry.

According to RSPB Scotland the UK’s breeding Whimbrel population, which is now found almost exclusively on Shetland, has declined rapidly in the last 20 years. The species is red-listed as a threatened species.

It is estimated the scheme will generate £566 million of capital expenditure and tens of millions of pounds in annual income for the island.

James Mackenzie, of Sustainable Shetland, said: “The EU Bird Directive affords the Whimbrel protection because it is a species in severe decline and the UK and the Scottish Government are bound by that and must take active measures to protect the Whimbrel.

“The Scottish Government’s own advisers Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), objected to the development because they thought the disturbance and mortality of whimbrel would be too much. SNH also had an objection on landscape grounds.”

Source:  David Ross, Highland Correspondent | The Herald | 28 January 2013 | www.heraldscotland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky