[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Endangered wading bird key to giant island development case  

Credit:  David Ross, Highland Correspondent | The Herald | 28 January 2013 | www.heraldscotland.com ~~

An endangered wading bird is central to a legal action opening at the Court of Session tomorrow against a giant island wind farm.

Sustainable Shetland is seeking judicial review of the decision of Scottish Ministers in April to grant consent for the Viking Energy wind farm on the Shetland mainland.

The original plan for 150 turbines was initially reduced to 127 after consultations and then the Scottish Government reduced the number further to 103 to resolve an issue regarding Scatsta airport.

The 850-strong campaign group says ministers could not reasonably have established the scientific facts over the protection of the Whimbrel bird without an inquiry.

According to RSPB Scotland the UK’s breeding Whimbrel population, which is now found almost exclusively on Shetland, has declined rapidly in the last 20 years. The species is red-listed as a threatened species.

It is estimated the scheme will generate £566 million of capital expenditure and tens of millions of pounds in annual income for the island.

James Mackenzie, of Sustainable Shetland, said: “The EU Bird Directive affords the Whimbrel protection because it is a species in severe decline and the UK and the Scottish Government are bound by that and must take active measures to protect the Whimbrel.

“The Scottish Government’s own advisers Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), objected to the development because they thought the disturbance and mortality of whimbrel would be too much. SNH also had an objection on landscape grounds.”

Source:  David Ross, Highland Correspondent | The Herald | 28 January 2013 | www.heraldscotland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: