[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

North Carolina’s green energy policies could be rolled back 

Credit:  By John Murawski | Charlotte Observer | Jan. 26, 2013 | www.charlotteobserver.com ~~

Conservatives have grumbled about the state energy law that mandates renewables and efficiency programs ever since it was passed in 2007 with Democrats in control.

This year, with a solid majority in the legislature and an ally in the governor’s mansion, Republicans hope to roll back the state’s green energy policy.

It’s part of a broader effort to reshape the state’s energy landscape to reflect conservative priorities. It will likely dovetail with Republican Gov. Pat McCrory’s campaign endorsement of offshore drilling and inland fracking for shale gas as a means of promoting energy independence.

McCrory is eager to work with neighboring states on offshore drilling, which is overseen by the federal government. If drilling rigs were to be built in the Atlantic Ocean, one item yet to be resolved would be North Carolina’s potential revenue sharing with the feds for any offshore waters leased for energy development.

McCrory has broken ranks with his fellow Republicans on at least one key point, however: He has embraced offshore wind farm development, saying it will boost North Carolina industries that make components for wind power. His embrace of wind power conflicts with lawmakers who want to drop the state requirement for renewables, such as solar and wind.

In the legislature, Republicans have plotted for several years to freeze the requirements that obligate Duke Energy and its subsidiary, Progress Energy, to use energy alternatives to meet customer demand. These include solar, wind and landfill methane gas, as well as paying financial incentives to customers who buy energy-efficient appliances. The law also applies to rural electric cooperatives and municipal power agencies.

It allows power companies to pay a premium to meet the state targets and to pass on those program expenses to customers. However, the law also caps the amount utilities can charge residential customers for the extra costs. The limit is $1 a month this year and increases to $2.83 a month in 2015 and thereafter.

Leading the repeal effort is Rep. Mike Hager, who chairs the House Public Utilities Committee and is a 17-year veteran of Duke Energy. Hager is hopeful his efforts will gain traction with the election of McCrory, himself a 29-year veteran of Duke Energy.

“My goal is not to subsidize industry in North Carolina as best as we can,” Hager said.

Hager and other critics say clean energy laws raise electricity rates by forcing power companies to buy more expensive forms of electricity. Those charges are disputed by advocates who say alternative energy is not only better for the environment, but a financially preferable option to building multibillion-dollar nuclear plants.

Electric utilities had to supply 3 percent of their retail sales from renewables and efficiency programs as of 2012, and Hager wants to freeze the mandate at that level. As currently written, the law will require Duke and Progress to supply 12.5 percent of retail power sales with renewables and efficiency programs.

Past efforts to repeal the law have stalled, largely because the utility companies have resisted tinkering with the policy.

Electric utilities had signed onto the original law and publicly remain neutral about proposed changes. Their main concern is to be able to charge customers to recover their costs for long-term solar contracts and other projects they have already committed to.

Source:  By John Murawski | Charlotte Observer | Jan. 26, 2013 | www.charlotteobserver.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon