[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Wind turbines: VACo joins Tazewell opposition 

Credit:  By BILL ARCHER | Bluefield Daily Telegraph | January 25, 2013 | bdtonline.com ~~

BLUEFIELD, Va. – The Tazewell County Board of Supervisors has picked up a powerful ally in its battle with Dominion Power over the placement of several wind turbine units on East River Mountain.

Charles Stacy, eastern district representative on the board of supervisors said that the Virginia Association of Counties has expressed concerns about SB 1341, the renewable energy facilities; exemption from land use regulations,” bill that was introduced in the General Assembly by State Senator Richard L. Saslaw, D-Springfield.

“VACo is adamantly opposed to this bill for reasons other than windmills,” Stacy said. “Their concern is that the bill would totally prohibit localities from being able to have a say in the kind of developments they want in their communities. VACo has a group of competent lawyers who can help present our position in committee meetings. We have a strong ally in VACo.”

Stacy said that he received an email from one of the many community groups nationwide that monitor state legislation related to wind energy developments.

“I’m still active with the local windmill group,” Stacy said. “When I received that email, it was like getting kicked in the stomach. We didn’t have anyone who tipped us off to this. We are wondering if this bill could have passed right on through if no one noticed it.”

State Senator Phillip P. Puckett, D-Russell, was aware that Saslaw introduced legislation for Dominion that is similar to a bill he introduced concerning Appalachian Power’s biennial reviews and the authority to petition for rate increases. Puckett said that he thought SB 1341 “was drooped on Monday,” but he now plans to examine it as it heads into the Senate Committee on Local Government.

Stacy said that he has been part of the opposition to Dominion’s planned wind energy farm on East River Mountain since the idea was initially proposed. “This issue is what brought me here,” Stacy said of his position on the board of supervisors. “The folks in the eastern district sent me here because of their opposition to Dominion’s proposal.”

According to Stacy, County Attorney Eric Young conducted an email poll of all 5 county supervisors, and the supervisors who had been divided 3-2 on the issue when the ridge line ordinance was passed, are now unanimous in their opposition to SB 1341.

“Eric’s email poll passed 5-0,” Stacy said. “Eric is sending our letter of opposition to Phillip (Puckett), Will (Del. James W. “Will” Morefield, R-Tazewell) and Annie B. (Del. Anne B. Crockett-Stark, R-Wythe) so they are aware of our position.

“When the board voted on the ordinance, Seth (White) opposed the ordinance,” Stacy said.

“Seth said that at that time, the Legislature was saying that this was a local issue. Now, three years later, they’re saying it’s a General Assembly issue.”

Stacy said that the Mountain Preservation Association plans to continue monitoring the legislation as closely as possible, and travel to Richmond, Va., to make their voices heard if necessary.

Source:  By BILL ARCHER | Bluefield Daily Telegraph | January 25, 2013 | bdtonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky