LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Turbine applications turned down by Torridge 

Credit:  Sarah Howells | January 24, 2013 | North Devon Gazette | www.northdevongazette.co.uk ~~

Two separate applications for wind turbines in Torridge were turned down by the district council’s planning committee on Thursday.

One application was for the creation of Dunsland Cross wind farm with three turbines between 95m and 100m at Brandis Corner near Holsworthy, and the other was for a 102m turbine at Alscott Farm in Shebbear.

The Dunsland Cross application, submitted by Bolsterstone Innovative Energy, received more than 150 letters of objection and concerns were raised by Ashwater, Shebbear and Halwill Parish Councils.

The application for the turbine at Alscott Farm has received more than 200 letters of objection, and more than 100 letters of support.

Penny Mills, chairman of Torridge’s Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) group, said she was delighted with the decisions.

She said: “The CPRE had objected to both applications because they were totally inappropriate.

“In the case of the 102m, 500kw turbine at Alscott, the sheer enormous physical size of this turbine was out of all proportion with the amount of power it would generate.

“There was no justification for a height of such magnitude, which would have huge impacts over such a wide unspoilt area.

“Regarding the wind farm, this is the second time a wind farm proposal has been submitted and refused at this site at Dunsland Cross, Brandis Corner.

“Because of the close proximity to dwellings, to their amenity and the environment, the impact on wildlife and the adjoining SSSI, it really just is not the right place for a wind farm and we are so glad that the committee agreed.”

Source:  Sarah Howells | January 24, 2013 | North Devon Gazette | www.northdevongazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky