[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Scituate Board of Health to decide how to study wind turbine 

Credit:  By Jessica Bartlett, Town Correspondent | January 25, 2013 | www.boston.com ~~

A committee formed to determine the scope of a study on the health effects of Scituate’s wind turbine was unable to reach a consensus, and the town’s Board of Health now will make that decision.

The Steering Committee, consisting of town officials, turbine owners, and people who lived near the turbine, was appointed last November by health officials to decide how the turbine’s effects should be reviewed.

Yet despite several meetings, most recently on Jan. 15, residents on the committee still want a larger study than turbine owners are willing to provide.

“Once again, we basically reinforced the point to other members that the multifaceted approach that we were espousing and the broader approach in each category … had to be embraced,” said Tom Thompson, a spokesperson for community members who say the turbine is harming their health.

Community members have pushed for a three-pronged approach to studying the 400-foot-tall energy producer, which was installed with town permission in January 2012 and has been operating since March.

The first prong would be a thorough sound analysis that would look beyond the state- mandated sound levels, taking into account different ways of measuring sound to fully understand the impacts of the turbine.

The group also wants a shadow flicker study provided – one that would not only measure the turbine’s shadow flicker output vs. what was expected in models, but also review and understand the health effects of the flicker itself.

Third, group members have pushed for a survey to be taken of nearby residents to fully understand how the turbine affects them.

“There has been no previous study completed, be it acoustic, shadow flicker or health impact related, since the industrial wind turbine became operational,” Thompson said. “What [was done] is flawed modeling that was utilized as part of the approval process, that grossly understated both the actual noise and shadow flicker emanating from the wind turbine.”

According to Thompson, the three-pronged approach would most likely show that the turbine is not operating within its current guidelines, and is harming residents’ health. But he said the town isn’t willing to embrace that approach.

“It points to the larger issue, that the town and the Board of Health are very concerned about the economic implications of shutting that turbine down, and I think their biggest concern is they don’t want to be sued for breach of contract,” Thompson said. “They will continue to delay…things for that exact reason.”

Yet according to Gordon Dean, president of Palmer Capital and owner of the Scituate turbine, the acoustical study that his side of the group has suggested would accurately determine if there is a problem with the way the turbine operates.

Furthermore, Dean said he was confident in the state and town guidelines for noise requirements, and that if the turbine met those guidelines, it would prove the machine is safe to the public.

“I think its safe to the public, absolutely,” he said. “There’s a noise standard that’s applicable to all business, all power plants, all basic activities in the state. I don’t know why they would try to carve out wind and make it a different standard.”

Already, the Steering Committee has been looking at engineers who could do a study.

Dean said he has provided the group with a list of seven engineers who could do the work. The resident group has yet to provide one.

But Thompson sees a more fundamental problem.

“We’re putting together a list of people that could handle the acoustical part of this. But it seems to be a waste of time to do an analysis on acoustical engineers when you can’t get an agreement on scope,” he said.

Regardless, Board of Health officials will meet on Jan. 28 to determine next steps, which could include setting a scope of work themselves, and possibly moving forward with a contractor.

Dean said he is looking to more ahead.

“We would like to put it behind us. We’d like to feel that the study we know needs to be done – to determine compliance – will be accepted by people. We’re disappointed that we haven’t been able to figure out where to do sampling and what conditions, but it’s par for the course.”

Source:  By Jessica Bartlett, Town Correspondent | January 25, 2013 | www.boston.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky