LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

The great German bird massacre – is it a myth? 

Credit:  24 January 2013 | By Pelle Neroth | Engineering and Technology Magazine | eandt.theiet.org ~~

How many birds are killed every year by wind turbines?

In Germany it is a perennial issue.

With the country set to abandon nuclear power by 2022, and wind turbines planned to take up much of the slack, environmentalists are finding themselves in a bind because of the conflict between two issues close to their hearts: global warming and preservation of the nation’s wildlife.

It has to be said that estimates of the number of bird deaths vary widely.

One study monitoring the migrating flock of an estimated 1.5 million eider manoeuvring past a small wind farm recorded only a single collision event.

The environmental audit unit of the state of Brandenburg has counted a mere 681 bird deaths nationwide since it started keeping records on behalf of the German environment ministry in 1989.

A disproportionate number of those, however, are large, slow breeding and relatively rare birds of prey.

Other authorities cite much higher numbers.

Hermann Hötker, from the Michael Otto conservation centre in Bergenhausen, argues that in some areas the figure could be between one and 10 birds a year per turbine, based on Dutch and Belgian studies carried out near breeding areas.

Since there are 22,000 turbines in Germany, the avian death toll could be tens of thousands of birds a year or even more.

Some fly into the rotors or the tower; other, smaller, birds are flung to the ground by the powerful vortex created by the turbines.

Death rates vary per wind farm and are related to many factors, such as migratory paths, topography, sight conditions, weather patterns and wind turbine lights, which may disorientate the birds.

Hötker lists the difficulties of getting an accurate count, which lead some authorities to understate deaths.

Some corpses get lost in the corn fields. Others are scavenged by predators.

Landowners do not have an incentive to report dead birds.

Offshore wind farms are also a worrying unknown for campaigners: it is hard to count bird corpses that fall into the sea.

To opponents of wind farms, this is just one more argument against them.

Already they are accused of disfiguring beauty spots.

The power they provide is intermittent, depending on the vagaries of wind.

The sound they make purportedly causes insomnia and stress problems for some people. Also, the turbines are quite expensive and only last a little more than two decades.

But Germany remains committed to wind, and its own investment in turbines, as well as wind’s intermittency, has had effects on the energy situation all over central Europe.

Germany dumps its surplus wind energy at prices which, for instance, Czech nuclear power cannot undercut.

In wind farms’ defence, you also have to look at the many thousands of birds killed by cats or road traffic or by flying into windows.

Still, the Michael Otto institute favours measures like growing crops right up to the turbine towers to hide the presence of predators’ food, e.g. mice.

The argument wind farm supporters use that they feel trumps everything is that global warming will lead to even worse consequences for species survival.

The occasional bird caught in a wind turbine is a price worth paying to save the planet, they say.

Source:  24 January 2013 | By Pelle Neroth | Engineering and Technology Magazine | eandt.theiet.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky