| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Island power dream fading
Credit: By NOEL MURPHY | 18th January 2013 | www.starnewsgroup.com.au ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Plans for a $2 billion King Island wind farm have struck trouble long before the project could ever power up the region.
Firebrand independent federal senator Nick Xenophon has criticised the potential cost to taxpayers and the contribution of green power on rising electricity costs.
The endangered orange-bellied parrot, which cruelled a wind farm plan for Gippsland’s Bald Hill, has also raised its beak as another potential threat to the ambitious project.
Hydro Tasmania’s 200-turbine, 600-megawatt TasWind project, which would be the largest wind farm in the Southern Hemisphere, would use Roaring Forties wind to generate electricity for up to 240,000 houses.
The facility could be operational within six years, with a feasibility study due to start in April.
Senator Xenophon said the plant would still need coal-generated power as a back-up.
“We should be focusing on developing baseload renewables such as geo-thermal rather than unreliable wind energy,” he told the Independent.
“A real problem with wind energy is that, because it is intermittent and unreliable, coal-fired power stations need to be on stand-by, which is inefficient.
“There is also a real concern regarding excessive noise for residents living near these wind factories and the potential disturbance they can cause to people’s sleep and lives generally.
Senator Xenophon said a place for wind energy existed in the “renewable-energy mix’’ but the trouble was that the rules were “stacked in favour of wind factories rather than baseload renewable energy sources such as geo-thermal and solar-thermal”.
Activists seeking to save the orange-bellied parrot activists have weighed into the debate, arguing that every remaining member of the endangered species used King Island on both north and south migrations between Tasmania and the mainland.
Activists told the Independent environmental assessments of the King Island proposal needed to scrutinise carefully the birds’ movements and habits and any possible threat from the wind turbines.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Funding |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=32438 ]
