[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]




LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Active eagle nest removed to make way for wind farm  

Credit:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | January 20, 2013 | eastcountymagazine.org ~~

Wildlife protection groups and residents have reacted in horror to the removal of an active bald eagle nest by a wind developer in Canada, an event documented on video January 5, just weeks after a photo of the active pair was taken at the site.

Now ECM has learned that the environmental documents filed by Iberdrola Renewables for its Tule Wind project in McCain Valley would allow SDG&E to “remove all existing raptor nests” prior to construction.

The removal of the bald eagle nest at Haldimand in the Canadian province of Ontario on January 5 was documented on video by the Ontario Wind Resistance group.  The removal was done by contractors working for Nextera Energy, leading opponents to dub the company “NextTerror.”  The Canadian government authorized the removal despite the fact that the bald eagle is a species of concern in Ontario, because it was within 20 meters of a proposed turbine blade sweep. 

The same fate may soon befall nests for eagles and other birds of prey (such as hawks and eagles) in McCain Valley, site of Iberdrola Renewable’s Tule Wind project that the Bureau of Land Management and County of San Diego have approved in East County.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recently passed new regulations to allow the wind industry to obtain permits for nest removal:   http://www.fws.gov/forms/3-200-72.pdf    Permits may be obtained where removal of a bald or golden eagle nest is “necessary to alleviate a safety emergency to people or eagles.”

Jim Wiegand, wildlife biologist with Save the Eagles International, has blasted the action. “Of course, there probably has never been one eagle nest removal that was a `safety emergency’ to people,’” he observed. 

Could it happen here? In a word, yes. 

The Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement for Tule Wind states, “Prior to construction, SDG&E will remove all existing raptor nests from existing structures that will be affected by Project construction.”

Wiegand warns that the Cane Brake nest in McCain Valley might be targeted for removal. He provided the following map:

eagle map

Several months ago, the USFW adopted a highly controversial policy to issue “take” permits to wind developers exempting them from prosecution for killing limited numbers of endangered eagles.  Killing an eagle by others is a felony punishable by prison and fines up to $100,000. Take permit applications for eagles have been submitted by wind developers already in Minnesota, Oregon and North Dakota. 

Evidence is mounting of the deadly toll taken by wind turbines on birds and bats.  In Spain alone, an estimated 6 million to 18 million birds and bats are killed by wind turbines every year. Raptors, or birds of prey, are particularly susceptible because wind farms are typically built in areas with strong wind currents used by raptors.

In Germany, research done by the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research found that German turbines killed bats from up to a thousand miles away, suggesting that “turbines were not only affecting local wildlife but could be dramatically affecting population numbers from across northeastern Europe,” Clive Hambler, a specialist in species extinction from Oxford University, wrote in an essay published in the UK Spectator.

He suggests that current renewable energy sources may be doing more harm than good. 

“Wind farms are devastating populations of rare birds and bats across the world, driving some to the point of extinction,” the species extinction expert concludes. “Most environmentalists just don’t want to know. Because they’re so desperate to believe in renewable energy, they’re in a state of denial. But the evidence suggests that, this century at least, renewables pose a far greater threat to wildlife than climate change.”  http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/8807761/wind-farms-vs-wildlife/

Source:  By Miriam Raftery | East County Magazine | January 20, 2013 | eastcountymagazine.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Wildlife


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter