[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Chiplow: Judge backs wind turbine plans  

Credit:  20 January 2013 | www.lynnnews.co.uk ~~

Campaigners have admitted they have reached the end of the road in their fight against two controversial wind farm plans following a legal ruling.

The comment came after a High Court judge decided there was insufficient evidence to overturn planning consent for the Chiplow and Jack’s Lane developments at Bagthorpe and Stanhoe respectively.

Jonathan Powell, chairman of Creakes Action for Protecting the Environment (CAPE), one of two campaign groups which brought the case, said: “I think it’s the end of the line. The cost of doing this is out of all proportion for a small village group.

“People have been brave, courageous and hardworking, but there is a limit and you’re taking on huge interests.”

CAPE, together with Against Turbines at Chiplow (ATAC) had been seeking a ruling which would have forced the government to look at the plans again.

They argued that a government planning inspector had failed to take proper account of evidence given by an expert at a public inquiry last year, who said the impact on a nearby ancient monument, Bloodgate Hill Fort, would be greater than he initially thought.

But the judge, Mrs Justice Lang, rejected their claims in a ruling announced on Tuesday.

She said there was insufficient evidence to support campaigners’ claims that the discrepancy amounted to a major change in the expert’s testimony, pointing out that the difference had been made clear in written submissions.

She added: “In my judgment, on a straightforward reading of the decision letter, there is no genuine doubt as to what the inspector decided and why, and therefore the reasons why the challenge must fail.”

Mr Powell said he felt local residents, who have fought the plans for more than three years, were “numb” at the ruling.

And he claimed on-shore wind farms did not deliver enough for the money spent on them.

He added: “Our open spaces are increasingly rare. We need to guard them and if we’re going to give them up, make sure the reasons justify them. In this case they don’t.”

Source:  20 January 2013 | www.lynnnews.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.