[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Aylesbury Vale council rejects Ford turbine plan 

Credit:  BBC News | 18 January 2013 | www.bbc.co.uk ~~

Plans for a wind turbine “taller than Big Ben” near a Buckinghamshire village have been rejected by the council.

Aylesbury Vale District Council refused the application for the turbine in Ford, nearly Aylesbury, on the grounds it would affect the landscape.

The planned structure measured 101m (331ft) to the blade tip and was predicted to power about 350 households.

Applicant and farmer Jeremy Elgin said he was “disappointed” and may appeal.

“We will be looking at all the options and an appeal is one of them,” he said.

‘Somewhat perplexed’

He added that he was “somewhat perplexed” because a larger structure of 149m (489ft) had been permitted on appeal at Quarrendon, north of Aylesbury.

“We are disappointed that council members didn’t see [our proposal’s] merits,” he said.

“When you look at the ongoing insecurity of the areas where we import our fossil fuel from, we feel a greater emphasis should be put on energy security,” he said.

“Given that the UK has the best wind resource within Europe we should make more use of it.”

Protesters had been concerned the turbine would ruin the natural landscape of the Vale of Aylesbury and the Chilterns.

Parish councillor Martin Usherwood, from the Ford Action Group Against Wind Turbines, said it would have been a “major mistake” to allow the application to go through.

“This was a very tall structure, bigger than Big Ben, in open countryside against the Chiltern Hills, an area of outstanding natural beauty, surrounded by small villages and conservation areas with a lot of cultural heritage and listed buildings,” he said.

“The danger would be that if you have one go up, others would follow.”

Source:  BBC News | 18 January 2013 | www.bbc.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon