[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

2 km setback not possible for wind turbines 

Credit:  Natalie Paddon , The Hamilton Spectator Wed Jan 16 2013 | www.thespec.com ~~

SMITHVILLE A West Lincoln alderman who doesn’t want wind turbines in the township told a packed community meeting that he won’t support a proposal for boosting the setback distance of turbines from homes.

“It’s illegal,” John Glazier told a planning committee meeting attended by about 500 community members on Monday that ran close to seven hours. “I cannot expose residents of West Lincoln to a potential lawsuit” that could result in a “huge potential cost.”

Glazier, who represents Ward 3, said he wouldn’t support a motion by fellow alderman Alex Micallef for a two-kilometre setback, because Ontario’s Green Energy Act has a 550-metre rule. However, Glazier did say he is hopeful Ontario’s next premier might reform the setback distance in the Act. The township will continue pushing for changes.

Brian Treble, director of planning and building for the township, said the proposed two km setback was discussed in a staff report released last February.

Micallef, who withdrew the motion at the meeting, said he’d do more research to make his proposal more concrete. He said afterward that he “pulled it off the table so people wouldn’t think it was over.”

Opponents and supporters lined up to express their views about two proposed wind turbine developments at the meeting, held at South Lincoln High School in Smithville.

IPC Energy has submitted applications for five turbines and Niagara Region Wind Corporation hopes to get approval for 77 turbines, 44 of which would be in West Lincoln.

Ward 1 Alderman Sue-Ellen Merritt told the crowd she inquired about a potential referendum asking residents if they are willing to defend their municipality in support of the 2 km setback if it was taken to a lawsuit, which could result in a significant tax increase. But Merritt said township staff directed her to a section of the municipal act that prevents it.

Shellie Correia, who chairs the communications committee of the West Lincoln Glanbook Wind Action Group, said after the meeting she felt “there really was no resolution.”

The group has been lobbying against the $550-million NRWC project that has sites for the 44 wind turbines in West Lincoln, plus 31 in Haldimand and five in Wainfleet, for nearly two years.

Correia, who read a letter from her son’s behavioural pediatrician at Monday’s meeting, is concerned about how the vibration and repetitive sound of wind turbines will affect her son, who has sensory issues.

She said she hopes more members of the public get in touch with council to express their feelings about the proposed developments.

Cathy Vitucci, a local farmer who signed up with NRWC to explore having a wind turbine on her farm, said she’d like to see council unified on the topic.

“Whether they’re on my side or not I don’t care. They need to stand their ground.”

NRWC spokesperson Randi Rahamim said her company viewed the meeting as “West Lincoln’s debate,” but representatives were there to listen and support landowners who participate in their project.

NRWC will hold six public meetings in the six affected rural communities (Haldimand County, Lincoln, Wainfleet, West Lincoln, Grimsby and Pelham) during the first week of February, where they will present information and answer questions, Rahamim said.

Source:  Natalie Paddon , The Hamilton Spectator Wed Jan 16 2013 | www.thespec.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky