LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Lawyer: Scituate couple agreed not to contest turbine 

Credit:  By Sara Feijo | The Patriot Ledger | January 15, 2013 | www.patriotledger.com ~~

A Scituate couple fighting a wind turbine near their Driftway home signed a confidential agreement with the turbine’s owner, Scituate Wind, in which they agreed not to contest the turbine’s permit, the lawyer for the town’s health board told a judge Monday.

Mark and Lauren McKeever received $20,000 for signing the agreement, and at least six trees were put up as a sound and sight buffer between the turbine and their property, Scituate Board of Health lawyer Jonathan Davis said during a hearing Monday afternoon at Brockton Superior Court.

Davis said he obtained a copy of the agreement with a subpoena.

The McKeevers, who live 640 feet from the 390-foot-tall turbine operated by Scituate Wind, asked a Superior Court judge to shut down the turbine until their lawsuit against the town’s board of health over the turbine’s alleged health hazards is resolved.

Judge Charles Hely did not make a decision Monday, and took the matter under advisement.

Tanya Trevisan, the couple’s lawyer, said the turbine has harmed her clients’ health since it started operating last March.

She said the McKeevers and their children have been suffering from “sleep disturbance, headaches, extreme fatigue, nausea, dizziness, ear pressure and pain, anxiety, and difficulty concentrating at work and school” because of the turbine’s noise and shadow flicker.

Studies conducted before the installation of the turbine indicate that the sounds it emits are within state law, Davis said.

According to state law, a turbine can’t emit noise more than 10 decibels louder than ambient noise.

Davis said the family must show evidence and studies that confirm they have received “substantial and unreasonable harm.”

“The plaintiff has not submitted any studies that contradict that (the original studies),” Davis said.

Melissa Brennan, the family’s spokeswoman, declined to comment on the agreement with Scituate Wind.

Source:  By Sara Feijo | The Patriot Ledger | January 15, 2013 | www.patriotledger.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky