News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Brightenber turbines appeal to be held in public  

Credit:  Craven Herald & Pioneer | 13th January 2013 | www.cravenherald.co.uk ~~

An appeal into refused plans for a wind farm near Gargrave is to be decided by either a public hearing or inquiry.

The appeal by Energiekontor UK into the refusal last year by Craven District Council for three 100- metre turbines at Brightenber Hill was originally to be decided following written representations.

But, following representations by objectors and Skipton MP Julian Smith, the appeal hearing will now be held in public.

A spokesman for the Planning Inspectorate said that the council and Energie-kontor had been contacted and a decision would be made shortly.

He confirmed that the appeal would not now be dealt with by written representations, which would have meant the public would not have been allowed to speak, and the matter would have been dealt with by an inspector considering written representations.

Planning permission for the three turbines was turned down by all but the chairman at a special meeting of the council’s planning committee held at Gargrave Village Hall in September.

It was the second application by Energiekontor which had had its first scheme for five turbines on the same site refused by the council and also refused on appeal by the Planning Inspectorate.

The wind company believed its second scheme would be acceptable after it addressed concerns by the appeal inspector over the closeness of one of the turbines to nearby Ash Tree Farm.

But councillors also refused plans for three turbines on the site on the grounds the residential amenity of those living in the farm would still be damaged by the “dominant and oppressive” turbines.

Source:  Craven Herald & Pioneer | 13th January 2013 | www.cravenherald.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.