[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind farm terms are misleading  

Credit:  The Galloway Gazette | 13 January 2013 | www.gallowaygazette.co.uk ~~

Why is it that everything to do with wind technology is not what the wind industry claims it to be?

Indeed, a wind turbine is not a turbine, but simply a wind-driven electrical generator (WDEG). To be sure, actual turbines are to be found in coal, gas, oil, hydro and, yes, nuclear power stations. It does not take a genius to recognise that although these power stations use different sources of energy, all employ turbines and generators. Another misleading term is “wind farm”, which is no more than a collection of wind-driven generators, and Charles Parsons, the inventor of the steam turbine must truly be turning in his grave.

The term “wind turbine” is simply a clever marketing ploy to seduce the ignorant and gullible, a pretence that a costly, disfiguring and ineffective machine is to be regarded as a much more sophisticated and efficient device than it actually is. Most importantly, the public should recognise that landowners are more than happy to be seduced by the wind industry and its subsidies, skipping all the way to the bank, while you, dear reader, have to be content with ever increasing energy bills.

The wind industry has been very successful in its marketing efforts by conning not just the public but politicians, engineers and the media alike, and I leave you to assess the full idiocy of the term “wind farm”. Looking at the immediate future and our energy requirements, folk should recognise the UK is potentially sitting on one of the biggest shale gas fields in the world.

In the United States the price of shale gas has collapsed from $12 per thousand cubic feet in 2007 to around $3 today. Think what this will mean to global economies – market forces will alter the geo-political map of the world since we will not be dependent on countries such as Russia and the Middle East for our gas supplies in the future. It is not an understatement to say, a new gas age cometh, for, make no mistake, gas is the best future energy source as globally the planet can provide us with about 250 years worth of gas supplies, possibly longer, if common sense prevails and energy conservation is pursued in a much more meaningful manner such as using LED technology for lighting and thus offering a 90% saving in energy use. Tidal and ocean current generation, plus solar panels, should also be part of the energy equation, not forgetting co-generation whereby your central heating boiler also generates electrical power. So let us hope the new year will usher in a period of true enlightenment and the false prophets to be seen in their true clothing.

Dave Haskell,

Golygfa Frenni Fawr,

Newchapel Road, 
Boncath, Pembs.

Source:  The Galloway Gazette | 13 January 2013 | www.gallowaygazette.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter