[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

University ‘motivated by profit’  

Credit:  By Michael Alexander | The Courier | 11 January 2013 www.thecourier.co.uk| ~~

Anti-windfarm campaigners have accused St Andrews University of being more interested in making profit from the UK’s “morally dubious” wind subsidy system than in bolstering its green credentials.

The comment has been made by the Kenly Landscape Action Protection Group (KLPG), after it emerged that the university has lodged a strongly-worded appeal against Fife Council’s decision to reject its proposals for a “vital” windfarm at Kenly, south of St Andrews.

As reported by The Courier yesterday, in a 55-page appeal document submitted to the Scottish Government’s Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals (DPEA), Brodies – the solicitors acting for the university – blames Fife Council’s planning department for “misleading” councillors when they rejected the planning application.

KLPG spokesman David Chalmers told The Courier: “The university is pushing its wind farm through against the wishes of local communities, against objections from major tourism stakeholders in St Andrews, against the considered opinion of Scottish Natural Heritage and against the unanimous democratic decision of Fife councillors.

“Its community consultation has been derisory and derisive; its offer of community benefit no more than beads for natives. The university’s arguments for the wind farm are lifted from wind industry propaganda and dressed up with special pleading as one of Scotland’s leading universities – and by implication not an exploitative commercial developer.

“The ‘green’ argument depends on unproven assumptions about efficiency and carbon-saving, and ignores the impact of wind’s intermittent generation on the grid as a whole. The ‘economic’ argument is risible, given the overwhelming research which shows that windfarms destroy between two and four jobs for every one they create.

“The university’s real motivation is profit, and, in particular, the opportunity to mop up millions of pounds in subsidy. Kenly is projected to earn between £3 and £4 million annually for 25 years. Half of this is subsidy, which every electricity consumer in the UK will be obliged to pay.

“The wind subsidy system isn’t just morally dubious as it drives ever increasing numbers of families into fuel poverty. It’s also politically and economically unsustainable as experience in other countries more advanced in wind development shows.”

A spokesman for St Andrews University responded: “It is important to point out that of the 372 objections made to Fife Council, over 84% are the same template letter, produced by the KLPG. By contrast, there are 200 letters of support for the Kenly wind project publicly registered with the council and available for inspection. None are 

“We have always acknowledged the opposition of KLPG and their particular reasons for objecting to our renewables project, but it should also be acknowledged that there is clear, independent support for Kenly within local communities, which cannot be discounted, or shouted down. It is simply not true to say that the university is pursuing this against the wishes of local communities.

“We are a 600-year-old, not-for-profit institution, whose mission has always been research and teaching. Kenly has never been about profit. The power it generates will be used by the university in St Andrews to allow us to become less reliant on external energy sources, whose constantly rising prices are a present threat to our mission.

“We’re proud of our commitment to sustainable development; we teach it, we research it, we’ve won national and international awards and praise for it, it’s in line with Scottish Government objectives for universities and we do our best to practice what we teach and innovate 
wherever possible.

“Kenly is a natural extension of our commitment to sustainable development and we are continuing to talk to interested parties and individuals locally about the potential for major community 

Source:  By Michael Alexander | The Courier | 11 January 2013 www.thecourier.co.uk|

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.