LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

‘No’ to turbines scheme over air traffic concerns 

Credit:  12 January 2013 | www.longridgenews.co.uk ~~

Plans for two wind turbines in Great Eccleston have been rejected by Wyre Council, on the grounds that they could interfere with air traffic.

The application had been for two 1 
8.4 metre high (to hub) (24.9 metres to tip of blade), 11ke wind turbines, at White House Farm, White House Lane.

But the council turned down the plan, saying the turbines would be contrary to national planning guidelines, which say turbines should be 12.5 km from the sight lines of aerodromes, and that they would “cause unacceptable interference to air traffic control” at Warton Aerodrome.

The report from officers said the turbines would have a detrimental impact on the performance of the MOD ATC and range control radars, specifically the desensitisation of radar and the creation of “false” aircraft returns, which air traffic controllers must treat as real.

As such, the proposal would compromise aircraft safety.

The report added that the application did not demonstrate that there would be no impact with regard to “flicker”– the turning blades casting flickering shadows – or, if necessary, how this would be mitigated.

Without this information, said the report, the application was considered to be too inadequate to enable the local planning authority to assess the application in this respect.

Source:  12 January 2013 | www.longridgenews.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky